It’s with a heavy heart to relay the news that Doug Ziegler died this Saturday morning.
Ziegler was a ‘Godfather’ of the community with his philanthropic goodwill, leadership and community support.
“Doug was quite determined and dedicated to persevering to what ever a group’s goals might be,” George Prescott said.
Prescott is a local business man and owner of GP Management Services in West Bend. He relayed the story about when he and his wife Judi were starting the Prescott Family Foundation and how Ziegler was the guest speaker at the kickoff meeting.
“He came in and gave us a talk on the ‘joy of giving,’” said Prescott. “The joy of giving and how nice it makes you feel to help people. It was a very stimulating piece of work and that was almost 20 years ago and he was the same driving guy up until yesterday.”
Appointments Coming in for New Ethics and Elections Commissions
by Owen | 2233, 4 Mar 1616 | Politics - Wisconsin | 0 Comments
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos has named a former Republican state lawmaker and a Republican National Committeeman to new state commissions overseeing ethics and elections.
Former Rep. Pat Strachota, R-West Bend, was Vos’ pick for the ethics panel and RNC member Steve King of Janesville his choice for the elections panel.
On June 30, the new partisan panels will replace the outgoing Government Accountability Board, whose members are nonpartisan. The transition was triggered by a law passed by GOP lawmakers and signed by Gov. Scott Walker in December.
I see some chattering about how “partisan” these appointments are… they’re supposed to be. Remember that, as our Founders knew, non-partisanship is a fiction. So instead of charging at the windmill of an unachievable utopia, these commissions are based on balancing the very real, and known, biases of the participants. It is the same principle of balance upon which our entire federal system of government was based.
Wisconsin Looks to Clear Old Food Stamp Balances
by Owen | 0912, 4 Mar 1616 | Politics - Wisconsin | 1 Comment
Under the plan, FoodShare accounts that go untouched for six months would be wiped clean of all benefits. To regain access to benefits, participants would be allowed to request reactivation of their account or reapply for the program.
The bill also allows the state to take away all benefits that are more than a year old, even if an account is still in use.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Andre Jacque, R-De Pere, cited an investigative report from a Green Bay television station as the impetus for the legislation. The report found that some FoodShare recipients have balances as high as $14,000.
We want people who need the help to use it. If they aren’t using it, then let’s put it back in the pool so that there’s more money for people who will use it.
Paul Ryan Pushes Back on Trump
by Owen | 2156, 2 Mar 1616 | Politics, Politics - Wisconsin | 37 Comments
Heh.
“When I see something that runs counter to who we are as a party and as a country, I will speak up, so today I want to be very clear about something,” Ryan said.
“If a person wants to be the nominee of the Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games. They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people’s prejudices. We appeal to their highest ideals. This is the party of Lincoln.”
He added: “This is fundamental. And if someone wants to be our nominee, they must understand this. I hope this is the last time I need to speak out on this race.”
Ryan appeared heartfelt in his denunciations, which were plainly aimed at Trump’s failure to disavow David Duke over the weekend, as well as at Trump’s casual use of his mighty twitter feed to promote the rantings of racists. And Ryan deserves credit for doing this, just as he deserved credit for denouncing in unequivocal terms Trump’s call for a temporary ban on non-citizen Muslims from entering the United States. There’s little doubt that Ryan personally finds Trumpism to be horrifying.
So… we are in a situation where if Trump wins the nomination and makes it into the White House, he already has a worse relationship with the Republican leaders in both chambers of the Congress than he does with the Democratic leaders.
Frustrating Trump
by Owen | 0635, 1 Mar 1616 | Politics | 22 Comments
My column for the West Bend Daily News is online. Here you go:
Some of our worst mistakes have been born out of the frustration to do something. Frustration over the rising cost of health care pushed the country to lurch into the disaster of Obamacare. Frustration over the ongoing American cost of Iraqi peace lured our nation into a precipitous withdrawal and the rise of ISIS. The Republican Party appears on the cusp of making another horrible mistake by making Donald Trump their nominee.
The rise of Trump is born out of the frustration of many Republicans with the direction of this country and the perceived inability, or unwillingness, of the Republican establishment to alter that direction. Republicans are frustrated with the ongoing failure of the federal government to stem the tide of illegal immigration that continues to drain our nation’s resources and jobs — particularly in the blue collar construction and agricultural industries.
Republicans are frustrated with the ever-increasing scope and size of the federal government. Between the rogue EPA’s onerous regulations to the federal government mandating the parameters of our health insurance, the federal government has its grimy fingers digging into the most mundane aspects of our everyday lives.
Many people, including Republicans, are frustrated with an increasingly violently intolerant culture that demands conformity to liberal thought. There are aspects of our American culture that no longer permit robust and respectful discussion about issues like gay marriage, race relations or even environmental sciences. Instead, any deviation from the current liberal canon is met with accusations of hate speech, ostracization and protests.
In the stew of all of this frustration, Trump bobbled to the top with the promise to “do something.” What will he do? Trump’s prescriptions are generally fanciful ideas, coated in bluster, broiled in rhetoric and sold with a vat of ego on the side. For example, Trump promises to build a border wall and make Mexico pay for it. He promises to eliminate the “lines around the states” to fix Obamacare. Trump plans to “make a deal” to bring peace to the Middle East. Serious people can do little but roll their eyes at such dross.
Trump’s lack of substance can, perhaps, be forgiven as people often look to presidents for broad-stroke ideas, not detailed policy plans, but his history and background cannot. Trump is a lifelong New York liberal. He is ardently pro-choice, anti-Second Amendment and pro “yuge” government. That is, he was until about a year ago when he decided to run for president as a Republican. Now he espouses all of the appropriate views if you are dim enough to believe him.
Trump’s personal and business life is also revealing. The story to his personal wealth is a long story of hustling, shady business practices, bankrupting others and outright frauds like Trump University. His personal life is a deviant jumble of mistresses and divorces.
Trump is everything Republicans have stood against for decades, but they are about to nominate him for president because he is speaking to their basest emotional frustrations and too many Republican voters have lost faith in the establishment.
Sometimes, however, the consequences of “doing something” for the sake of an emotional salve to untreated festering frustration is far worse than the disease. Should Trump win in November, he would not only be a bad president, he would be a dangerous one. His morals are unmoored by philosophy, religion, custom or even common decency, and his tempestuous ego will not be fettered by the strictures of the Constitution. Frustration and anger are not governing philosophies.
But more likely, should Trump be the Republican nominee, President Hillary Clinton will be sworn in next year (for you Bernie Sanders fans, the nomination process is rigged for Clinton). Trump has not yet garnered a majority of Republicans and his strong unfavorable ratings make a general election victory virtually impossible absent an utter collapse by the Democrats.
Furthermore, there are many conservatives, of which I am one, who will not vote for Trump in November under any circumstances. A President Trump presents too much of a danger to the republic and the conservative movement for me to even hold my nose and cast a vote in his favor. And while some Republicans will still turn out and vote for their senators and congressmen, many will not. The result could be a catastrophic loss for the Republican Party losing the White House, Senate and threatening the House. But if the Republican Party nominates Trump for president, they deserve a catastrophic loss. Unfortunately, the country will be worse for it.
There is still a little hope that Republicans will get their act together and nominate someone worthy to be our president, but the window of hope is closing rapidly.