Kill Your Pet to Combat Climate Change

In response to a story about how climate change is threatening our pets, Jay Weber made this brilliant point:

This is proof Gore and others aren’t serious about climate change. If they were, the story would be ‘We need to kill off all pets.They are useless, meat consuming, fart machines’

If you have a pet, you aren’t really serious about combating climate change.

8 Responses to Kill Your Pet to Combat Climate Change

  1. dad29 says:

    I would suggest that one’s G-5 is also a sign of……ummmm……..hypocrisy.

  2. Le Roi du Nord says:

    “If you have a pet, you aren’t really serious about combating climate change”.

    Not so.  But you can believe whatever you want..

  3. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Oh Nord,

    What use do pets serve to the greater liberal good of the global warming religion.

    If situation is as dire as you craxy liberal discisples make it out to be, we should be executing all pets to cut down on CO2.

    Fortunately, those of us with our head screwed on straight don’t by the constant crisis soothsaying designed to grab political power.

    Pets are safe…provided the liberal global warming zealots don’t aquire power.

  4. Le Roi du Nord says:

    k:

    I’m a pet owner, and have spent more effort and $$ doing what I can to combat climate change through my personal efforts, and promoting and funding educational efforts.  I’m pretty confident that my efforts outweigh and offset any adverse impacts my golden retriever may incur.

    I’m not sure what “craxy” means, I’ll let you explain.

  5. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    But you are not doing all you can.

    You allow a pet to unnecessarily warms the planet with their CO2 and methane emissions.

    You are not truly down with the cause!

    Fortunately, for you, I don’t believe your religious warming bunk.

    So I give you permission to be a hypocrite to your awful warming religion.

    Give the dog a treat.

    Keep Fido away from global warming zealotsz

  6. Le Roi du Nord says:

    You are right, k, I could have planted 2000 trees this spring instead of the 1000 that I did plant.  Or I could get my 60 MPG Geo Metro back on the road.  And I could be more active in my educational endeavors toward deniers like you.     And I could do more work to help tropical countries find a way to be successful without having to continually deforest tropical rain forests.  And what exactly is it you are doing??

    And no, there is no religion involved in my efforts.  Once again you lie because it makes you feel important.  But lying doesn’t make you credible, nor smart.

  7. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    I’m not doing anything, because I don’t believe in your absurd warming religion.

    I want more global warming. Longer growing season, greener planet, less pompous Marxists hiding their sick agenda behind the latest doomsday predictions.

  8. Le Roi du Nord says:

    k:

    It is a free country, so believe what you want.  But consider that GW/CC affects the poor at a greater rate than those better off.  Consider the adverse impacts rising sea levels have on low lying coastal areas in Bangladesh for example.  Rich folks can move, build up, build stronger.  Poor folks can’t.  Yet you wish the poor folks harm.  Bravo.

    And, as you well know but are ashamed to admit, there is no religion involved in GW/CC, just facts and long-term observations.  You always use religion to explain things you can’t or won’t understand.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.