Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...


Everything but tech support.

1025, 21 Jan 17

Liberals March

Let’s be clear… what is happening today is not a “women’s” march. The cement unifying these people is not their sex, but their ideology.

“They can protest, it’s their right, but don’t call it the ‘Women’s March,’ ” said Ellie Todd, 23, who drove to the inauguration with two friends from Spartanburg, South Carolina. “That makes it sounds like it’s a big unified thing, when really they’re picking very divisive issues and protesting against Trump – who by the way is now our president – instead of for something that would bring us all together. It’s not all women.”

Organizers have insisted that the march isn’t an anti-Trump protest but rather a rallying cry for women’s issues and a range of liberal causes that could be threatened by the Trump administration. The event’s policy platform covers issues such as racial profiling, climate change, abortion and LGBTQ rights. The official website lists 177 partners including Planned Parenthood, the Human Rights Campaign, the NAACP and Voto Latino.


1025, 21 January 2017


  1. Kevin Scheunemann

    These “women” are hilarious.

    1.) Fighting for abortion….where nearly 50% of those who are killed by abortion are female?  Killing females is “pro-woman”?

    2.) Climate change?   Never has there been a more public religion misleading so many.   So they waste time and energy, putting more carbon into the air with their travel and protest?   Hypocrites.

    3.) LGBQ rights? Fighting for men, who feel like women, to be in female showers and locker rooms everywhere.   I know quite a few women who have a big problem with that.

    I don’t see any “pro-woman” agenda anywhere.


  2. Le Roi du Nord

    “Never has there been a more public religion misleading so many”.

    Nope, another false claim.  christianity takes the prize.

    “I don’t see any “pro-woman” agenda anywhere”.

    That is because you don’t open your eyes.

  3. Kevin Scheunemann


    With your anti-Christian comment, at least you acknowledge climate change is a religion.   So we are making progress with you.

    I open my eyes and I don’t see how eliminating female babies before they are born is “pro-woman”….didn’t we, for the longest time, have a gripe with China for purposely selecting female babies for abortion?

    Letting men, who feel like women, into female showers and lockers rooms is also “pro woman”?   Nearly every female I know is against that.

    My eyes are open, I just don’t openly accept perverse behavior.



  4. penquin

    Also – The Boy Scouts don’t represent the views of all boys.

    *rolls eyes*



  5. Le Roi du Nord

    “you acknowledge climate change is a religion”.   Nope, you made that up.

    There are womens groups of all types and sizes that have pro-woman agendas,  some you may even agree with, that don’t say anything about abortion.  But then you would have to look beyond your narrow world view to see things like that…..

  6. Kevin Scheunemann


    So you are saying liberal agenda is “pro-woman”?


  7. Le Roi du Nord

    I’m saying you made a statement without any supporting evidence.  No surprise, as being factual hasn’t ever been a requirement for you.

  8. Paul

    Another comment ruined by these two blowhards.

Pin It on Pinterest