Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...


Everything but tech support.

2042, 03 Feb 15

Walker Proposes Changes to School Choice

Governor Walker gave his budget address tonight. The biggest thing that wasn’t already floated is a major change in School Choice. WisPolitics has some details:

In addition to lifting the caps on the number of students and schools that could participate in the choice program statewide, Walker is calling for a change to how the vouchers are funded for students added to the program and new limits on who can join.

After the program was expanded statewide two years ago, reports found the vast majority of students who joined were already attending private schools. Under the budget, those now in the outstate choice program would be allowed to remain. But those seeking to join the program going forward would already have to be attending a public school.

The vouchers are also now funded through a GPR appropriation. But funding for the outstate slots would be changed, under Walker’s plan. The schools who lose students to the choice program would have their aid reduced, and that money would then be pooled statewide and divided equally among the outstate choice students.

Doing so would smooth out the differences in the amount of state aid sent to districts based on property values, administration officials say. For example, districts with high property values receive less in state aid than those with low property values. The approach would ensure students from both districts would receive the same sized voucher, administration officials say.

Eh… it’s a step in the right direction, but I’m not crazy about it. What Walker is trying to do is make it so that he can expand school choice without adding spending. It’s a good goal, but a flawed way to get there.

The “problem” that Walker highlights is that many of the families who qualified for vouchers were already attending a private school. So the kids were already attending private school and it wasn’t costing the taxpayers anything, but now it is. It is an expense that the state taxpayers did not previously have.

This is only perceived as a “problem” in the context of government spending, but not in the overall purpose of school choice. The philosophy behind school choice is pretty simple. The taxpayers are obligated, both morally and constitutionally, to pay for an education for Wisconsin’s kids. In the existing system, rich families already have a choice to send their kids to the school of their choice. Means-tested vouchers level the playing field by facilitating the same choice for all families.

In this case, it is quite true that there are many families who qualify for vouchers – meaning that they are in the lower part of the income scale – were already sending their kids to private school. Some of them are making tremendous sacrifices to make it happen. Some are receiving financial aid through their churches or elsewhere. Some are managing to pay for it with support from their extended families. Now they can receive a voucher to make the sacrifice not as painful. So what? Why is this a “problem?” Are these families somehow less worthy than families who made different choices by sending their kids to public school? I certainly don’t think so. If people are worried that they were managing to send their kids to private school already, then lower the income threshold overall.

What I don’t like about Walker’s plan is that it creates a patchwork of rules that does not treat all people the same. Under his plan, families in Milwaukee and Racine are unaffected. Any of them still qualify irrespective of whether or not they already attend a private school or not. Families who already qualified for vouchers in the rest of Wisconsin can keep getting them. But families who either didn’t win the lottery last time, are just having kids come of age, or perhaps just slipped under the income threshold to qualify, may only receive a voucher if their kids attend a public school.

What a mess…

If this passes, expect a lot of families to enroll their kids in public school just to yank them out after the first day and move them to a private school with a voucher.

Like I said, it’s a step in the right direction in lifting the caps and looking for a better funding mechanism, but it should be a program that treats all families equally.



2042, 03 February 2015


  1. George Mitchell

    Excellent critique by Owen.

  2. Kevin Scheunemann

    Owen, you are correct.

    Parents will just send their kid to the godless public school for a day and yank them out to qualify.

    Why do Christian parents, who already instill Christian values in their kids through schooling (which is much better for society than the public school which cannnot properly educate the spirit for this life and eternity) get treated as second class citizens?

    Scott Walker is going to hear from me about this.

  3. Gee

    “Some are receiving financial aid through their churches or elsewhere. Some are managing to pay for it with support from their extended families. Now they can receive a voucher to make the sacrifice not as painful. So what? Why is this a “problem?” Are these families somehow less worthy. . . .”

    Yes, working-class families (based on the criteria) are worthy of taking more of our taxes. Fine — but not fine is your shift from all who actually gave the aid and now receives our tax monies, instead. You started your argument with the facts, as we now know, that many of these children were on scholarships from churches. So, now our tax monies will replace that aid, and our tax monies really are relief — welfare — for those churches.

    That is a different debate, and it deserves — we deserve for it — to be stated rather than dropped from your framing of this (aka a logic fail).

  4. Kevin Scheunemann


    If you are against funding of churches for education, you would have to call for the defunding for the church of liberalism, aka public school.

    Public school teaches all the favorite liberal religions with great fervor: Darwinism, global warming, abortion as a sacrament, the most conflicting/confusing central tenant of the liberal faith: that the child molestor can be changed/rehabilitated (but then in same breath teach being gay is not a choice.)

    So if we are going to fund faith in public school, lets stop funding a cold, empty, destructive liberal faith, exclusively.

    Can’t the liberal faith monopoly in public school not stand the competition?

Pin It on Pinterest