Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...


Everything but tech support.

2230, 22 Oct 18

Sarah Silverman and C.K.


Sarah Silverman has revealed she gave her old friend Louis CK permission to masturbate in front of her on multiple occasions.

The comic, 47, speaking on The Howard Stern Show on Monday, said the incidents happened when both were much younger.

‘I’m not making excuses for him, please don’t take this the wrong way, but we are peers we are equals, so when we were kids and he used to ask if he could masturbate in front of me, sometimes I would go “f*** yeah, I wanna see that.”‘

She also said this:

So I tell you this, I will vote for Hillary with gusto, as I continue to be inspired and moved to action by the ideals set forth by Bernie, who will never stop fighting for us. I am proud to be a part of Bernie’s movement and a vital part of that movement, and a vital part of that movement is making sure Hillary Clinton is the next president of the United States. Boo yah. Baba booey.

When will we stop allowing Hollywood to lecture us when they keep proving themselves to be a bunch of weirdos and creeps?


2230, 22 October 2018


  1. Pat

    I couldn’t agree more. We don’t need to look any further then at the reality star that occupies the White House for a true definition of a gross weirdo creep. And the traveling Hollywood circus that goes to the White House like, Kanye, Nugent, and Kid Rock.

  2. jjf

    “Silverman made the distinction between herself, and other women who felt coerced into giving Louis CK permission to pleasure himself.”

    So what’s wrong or “gross” about consensual sexual activities like that?

    Insert obligatory Trump reference, too.

    But enough about the sex talk!  I came here for the Owen’s insights into the Saudi mind regarding the Khashoggi murder.  Or heck, even any of the countless other murders committed there in the name of religion!

  3. Kevin Scheunemann

    Perverts wanting to lecture to us about morality.

    Oh liberalism, you never fail to make me laugh endlessly.

  4. Pat

    Thank God he didn’t grab her by the pussy!

  5. dad29

    Foust, your crude attempt at controlling the language exposes your…..malicious ignorance.

    It wasn’t religious, dumbass.  It was purely political.  Spies get killed, and enemies of the State get killed, too.

    Perhaps you don’t know that Saudi, Iran, and Turkey are theocratic states, not ‘democracies,’ or ‘republics.’  They aren’t really kingdoms, either.

    Go ahead.  Look it up.  It’s in Wiki and all those places.

  6. Le Roi du Nord


    So if saudi arabia is a theocratic state, how can anything their rulers do not be religious?

  7. Pat

    You have scratch your head and wonder how we got to this place in life. Reported today:
    “A Florida man who was arrested for allegedly groping a female passenger while on a flight reportedly told authorities “the president of the United States says it’s OK to grab women by their private parts.”

  8. dad29

    Easy, Nordski.  Emphasis on “STATE.”

    The claim is ‘theocracy,’ which I repeated; the reality is State.  As the Catholic Church found out, politics (state) will always dominate in a ‘theocracy.’  That’s why the Church got out of the King and Emperor biz.

    Israel has the same dilemma but has managed it–so far–by simply ignoring its Orthodox minority and subsuming the ‘theo’ into ‘material/martial’ in the Knesset.  The Arabs have been very helpful, forcing that ‘martial’ aspect to the forefront.

  9. MjM

    @daddio       That’s way over Nort’s head.  He’ll get a neck cramp.

  10. Kevin Scheunemann


    There is a clear difference between talking stupid and ACTING stupid.

    If you think the 2 are equal, you would be acting stupid.

  11. MHMaley

    He was not a spy and was there only to get the needed materials for a marriage license . Excuses for the behavior and the velvet glove treatment
    Of the entity that spawned the majority of the attackers of 911 is a continued stain On our country no matter what party happens to be in power.

    Commerce is never a valid excuse for tyranny .

  12. MHMaley

    Whoops – typing on a cell phone allows one to reply to the next
    Topic occasionally .

  13. Pat

    “There is a clear difference between talking stupid and ACTING stupid.”

    Hopefully you don’t act stupid.

  14. Le Roi du Nord


    Google “theocratic state” and you get this:

    “1.a form of government in which God or a deity is recognized as the supreme civil ruler, the God’s or deity’s laws being interpreted by the ecclesiastical authorities.

    a system of government by priests claiming a divine commission.
    a commonwealth or state under such a form or system of government.”

    So make up your own definition.  Or look it up, like I did.

    mjmumbles:  Ya whiffed on that one, too.


  15. MjM

    Nort prances: “Google “theocratic state” and you get this:”

    @daddio: See? Toldja. Waaaaayyyyy over his head. (queue: Peanut)

    How’s yer neck, Nort? Tired of looking up all the time? Put some ice on it.

  16. jjf

    Got it, Dad29.  Theocracies have nothing to do with religion!

    And when I referred to the countless other murders committed in the name of religion, you know I meant the way they torture or kill apostates and homosexuals, right?

    Let me guess.  Kevin wouldn’t want a theocracy, either?

    I should not have hijacked the conversation, I apologize.  I came here to talk about self-pleasuring.  Is it only “gross” if someone else wants to watch?

  17. Kevin Scheunemann


    I can only speak from Christian perspective. True Christians want everyone to know the grace of Jesus before departing of this earth, even our enemies.

    A true Christian theocracy, would delight in spreading the gospel to those willing to hear. It would not punish those who decide to reject the gospel message. It would only punish those hurting others in the society. A true Christian theocracy would encourage a society from sin, like homosexuality and toward grace of Jesus. It would defeat the purpose to practice what Muslim countries do in spades: execute homosexuals. Christians want everyone to be in grace of Jesus when their time of grace on this earth is up. Executing someone for sin of homosexuality before they find that grace of Jesus would be against the mission: making disciples of all.

    I’d be against a Muslim or evolution based theocracy….that would be a recipe for total, immoral, evil, godless, thug rule.

  18. dad29

    I came here to talk about self-pleasuring.

    Is that an area of intense interest to you, John?  Are you a voyeur?

    It’s clear that subtle but significant theo-political matters are not within your scope so go back to your strength.  Self-abuse.

  19. Pat

    Talk about thug rule…….Looks like right wing thugs are starting to target violence against CNN and Democrats. Such a shame.

  20. jjf

    You have an interest in my sexual preferences, experiences, pleasures, Dad29?  Tell me more!

    I think Kevin disagrees with you, Dad29.  He’s convinced his theocracy wouldn’t be like the bad theocracies you describe.

  21. Kevin Scheunemann


    A true Christian theocracy would be just fine.

    Muslim theocracy would stink.

    A crazy leftist evolution theocracy would be worse.

  22. Le Roi du Nord

    ” A true Christian theocracy would be just fine”.

    Maybe for the fanatics, but for folks without k’s “absolute” truth it would be a bummer.  Why does god have to be involved with governance?

  23. Kevin Scheunemann


    All good is derived from God.

    Good does not exist apart from God’s will.

  24. Le Roi du Nord

    And I’ll ask again; whose god?

  25. Kevin Scheunemann


    That is such a dumb question.

    There is only one Triune God. The rest are false gods.

  26. Le Roi du Nord

    Sez you.  >2/3 of humanity disagrees with you.  Your intolerant attitude is exactly why religion has absolutely no place in governance.

  27. Kevin Scheunemann


    I see you are intolerant of absolute truth.

  28. Le Roi du Nord

    Nope, I’m a pretty tolerant guy.  Truth is truth,  absolute truth is nonsense.

  29. Kevin Scheunemann


    Sounds like truth is relative when you make that statement.

    When truth is relative, you play the insane shifting morality of liberals.

  30. jjf

    I’m still waiting for an explanation of why masturbation between consenting partners is “gross” and for “weirdos” and “creeps.”

    I know Dad29 wants personal experience here, but I’ll let everyone anonymize it.  Does anyone here have a friend who ever did this?

  31. Le Roi du Nord


    And you making that statement above let’s everyone know you really have no interest in truth ( absolute or otherwise), but rather want to control the thoughts and minds through your intolerant version of religion.

    Truth is truth.  You don’t need to qualify it.And why do you concern yourself with truth when your idol has lied to us over 5000 times in less than 2 years?

  32. Kevin Scheunemann

    When you say “truth is truth”, now it sounds like you have absolute truth.

    Are you confused? You don’t want to admit absolute truth, but when pressed you support absolute truth.

  33. Le Roi du Nord


    No I didn’t, you are lying again…    But that should come as no surprise, as your idol has lied to us 5000+ times since inauguration.

Pin It on Pinterest