Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

West Bend School Board has not earned the right to ask for more money

Here is my full column that ran yesterday in the Washington County Daily News.

After conducting a sham survey that returned the results they paid to get, the West Bend School District’s Board of Education is deciding whether or not to ask the taxpayers for gobs more money via referendum.

Given they have been running the liberal playbook for passing a referendum, the school board is expected to punch it over the goal line and put a massive referendum on the November ballot. The school board should reconsider its reckless course and demonstrate the sensible fiscal management that the citizens deserve.

At issue is the manufactured facilities “crisis” at Jackson Elementary and the West Bend high schools. While the buildings are both perfectly functional and have decades of use left in them if properly maintained, some folks would like to remodel or replace them. Even though buildings have no impact on whether or not kids get a good education compared to what happens inside those buildings, constructing school buildings is easier than doing the hard work necessary to improve educational outcomes.

To that end, the school board created a Citizens Facility Advisory Committee last year that spent months in what proved to be manipulated process designed to tell the school board what it wanted to hear. Then the school board spent thousands of taxpayer dollars to conduct an equally fraudulent community survey that was also designed to tell it what it wanted to hear. On the weight of these two sham activities, the school board is now considering a referendum.

The survey results were presented to the school board last week. Of the approximately 40,000 adults in the district, 2,815 surveys were returned, constituting a 7 percent return rate. Of those 2,815 surveys, 93 percent lived in the district and 17 percent were employees of the school district. Even though the survey was disproportionally weighted with district employees and had a small sample, only 53 percent of respondents supported building a new elementary school in Jackson. The school board is interpreting the survey as telling them that the taxpayers would support a $50 million (not including interest) referendum.

There are many reasons that the taxpayers should not support a referendum in the West Bend School District, but let us highlight perhaps the biggest three.

First, despite the claims of builders and architects who make money from school construction, there is no correlation between fancy school buildings and the quality of education that takes place inside them. Once a minimal standard of safety and function are met, trendy reading nooks and naturally lit atriums do not help one child get a better education. If the school board wants to spend an additional $50 million of the taxpayers’ money, they should at least use the money to provide kids with a better education.

Second, enrollment in the West Bend School District is declining and is projected to continue the slide for the foreseeable future. This has almost nothing to do with the school district itself. It is a reflection of demographic trends and the expansion of alternative educational options. Online learning, School Choice, homeschooling, etc., all erode from an already shrinking student population. Why should the taxpayers invest an additional $50 million to build larger buildings for fewer kids?

Third, the school board has demonstrated poor stewardship of the taxpayers’ resources by failing to fully utilize the power given to it by Act 10 to manage the largest expense in the budget — personnel. Immediately after Act 10, previous school boards began down the path of implementing things like merit pay and benefits reform, but all of that progress stopped a couple of years ago.

Just last week, the Wisconsin Department of Administration released detailed description of the health insurance plans for every school district in Wisconsin. The data shows the least expensive family health insurance plan that the West Bend School District provides costs the taxpayers a whopping $21,864 per year. That compares to an average of $20,062 for all Wisconsin school districts and a national average of $18,764. The other plans offered are even more expensive. The West Bend School District is overpaying for health insurance.

Of that premium, a district employee can pay as little as $588 per year, or 2.7 percent, for their share of the premium if they receive a wellness incentive by passing a wellness screening and not smoking. This compares with an average of 11.7 percent for all Wisconsin school districts, 29 percent for state and local government employees across the nation, and 33 percent for private sector employees across the nation. On top of that, the district provides an onsite clinic for employees at no cost to the employees. Such clinics are supposed to lower the cost of health insurance, but the West Bend School District continues to pay well above the average cost for health insurance and asks employees to pay well below the average for their share.

A little quick math shows that if the West Bend School District simply paid the national average for a family health insurance plan ($18,764) and required employees to pay the national average share of the cost for state and local government employees (29 percent), it would save the taxpayers of the district $7,954 per family plan.

To date, the school board has failed to demonstrate sensible fiscal management on behalf of the citizens of the district.

Before the school board asks the taxpayers to sink tens of millions of more dollars into buildings for a district with declining enrollment, they must at least show that they are willing to use the tools available to them to manage the money they already spend.


0629, 25 July 2018


  1. ChrisJenkinsWB

    Loved this article Owen… I hope more voters understand the background to this referendum and use their voting power to let the Board know how we really feel.

    Thanks for doing the research.

  2. Jason

    The problem is the short term memory of your average voter (not to be confused with our own Average Joe, who has problems in plenty). The board now has this sham survey in their file cabinet and can and will pull it out every time to try again. Will we all remember the background of today when it’s up for vote in 2026?

  3. Mark Hoefert

    I think they are trying to catch a high-turnout election.  Watched a Board committee session in early 2016 – former Superintendent Ted Neitzke & Facilities Director Dave Ross were trying to advance the schedule for Jackson replacement, so that they could catch a high turnout election.  Board was not receptive, Ted rolled over and let it go, he had already given notice and was on the way out.

    November 2007:

    Off-year election.

    This one covered everything at once – multiple school replacements/additions/renovations.

    $120M referendum failed.  Overall 62.64% NO.  It did include Jackson school. Town of Jackson was 72.31% NO; Village of Jackson was 57.64% NO.  So, Village of Jackson was actually more supportive than the overall vote, but still NO.

    April 2009:

    Spring election.

    Ref#1 : Jackson School & improvements @ Decorah/Silverbrook. Overall 52.7% NO.  Town of Jackson 63.48% NO; Village of Jackson 51.82% NO.

    Ref#2: Badger Middle School Renovation/Addition. Overall 50.31 YES.  That was a squeaker.  Town of Jackson 62.8% NO; Village of Jackson 54.68% NO.  Should be noted that eventually all Jackson students transfer to Badger.

    November 2012:

    Presidential election.

    Silverbrook Renovation/Addition. Green Tree elementary addition. Barton school closure.  Restructuring of grades.  Silverbrook became Intermediate Middle School (grades 5-6) – grades 5 moved from Elementary schools to Silverbrook.  Badger changed from 6-7-8 to 7-8.  All WBSD students flow into Silverbrook for 5-6 & then go to Badger for 7-8.  Before that they split into Silverbrook or Badger for 6-7-8.  Of course, after 8th they split into East & West High Schools.

    Overall 51.73 YES.  A better margin than the April 2009 Ref#2.  Town of Jackson 58.56% NO; Village of Jackson 53.95% NO.  As noted with Badger, the Silverbrook improvements ultimately benefited Jackson residents.

    It is not my intention to imply that Jackson is responsible for any referendum failures.  I had checked a few elections – even at 100% YES from those wards the overall outcome would have been the same. Some of the townships also were strongly NO.  I think a factor in that is the WBSD covers a wide geographical area, and as distance increases, the feeling of connection to the schools diminishes.

    Sorry about all the detail in a blog comment, but sometimes details matter.

    Now we are coming upon the mid-term elections.

Pin It on Pinterest