Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

Owen

Everything but tech support.
}

1724, 27 Aug 16

“This is straight-up pay to play.”

Yep. Lesser people have gone to jail for this kind of behavior. It is pretty obvious how the Clintons made themselves mega-millionaires – they sold access to themselves.

Mrs. Clinton’s problem—as we now know from this week’s release of emails from Huma Abedin’s private Clinton-server account—was that there was no divide between public and private. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and her family foundation were one seamless entity—employing the same people, comparing schedules, mixing foundation donors with State supplicants. This is why she maintained a secret server, and why she deleted 15,000 emails that should have been turned over to the government.

Most of the focus on this week’s Abedin emails has centered on the disturbing examples of Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band negotiating State favors for foundation donors. But equally instructive in the 725 pages released by Judicial Watch is the frequency and banality of most of the email interaction. Mr. Band asks if Hillary’s doing this conference, or having that meeting, and when she’s going to Brazil. Ms. Abedin responds that she’s working on it, or will get this or that answer. These aren’t the emails of mere casual acquaintances; they don’t even bother with salutations or signoffs. These are the emails of two people engaged in the same purpose—serving the State-Clinton Foundation nexus.

The other undernoted but important revelation is that the media has been looking in the wrong place. The focus is on Mrs. Clinton’s missing emails, and no doubt those 15,000 FBI-recovered texts contain nuggets. Then again, Mrs. Clinton was a busy woman, and most of the details of her daily State/foundation life would have been handled by trusted aides. This is why they, too, had private email. Top marks to Judicial Watch for pursuing Ms. Abedin’s file from the start. A new urgency needs to go into seeing similar emails of former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.
Mostly, we learned this week that Mrs. Clinton’s foundation issue goes far beyond the “appearance” of a conflict of interest. This is straight-up pay to play.

}

1724, 27 August 2016

2 Comments

  1. Kevin Scheunemann

    Why is she not being held anywhere close to the Left’s scrutiny of Newt Gingrich?

    When you look at length’s liberals went through to manufacturer an ethics non-issue against Gingrich, Hillary should be facing life in prison under same leftist scrutiny for her actual crimes.

  2. Le Roi du Nord

    “actual crimes” ?  Really stretching today.  “Life in prison”?  Wow.

Pin It on Pinterest