Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

Owen

Everything but tech support.
}

2140, 11 Apr 16

Trump’s Oral Diarrhea Mentions Walker

Whatever.

“I like Walker actually in a lot of ways,” Trump told the newspaper. “I hit him very hard. … But I’ve always liked him. There are people I like, but I don’t think they like me because I have hit them hard.”

Asked Monday in Madison about the comments, Walker wouldn’t rule out being Trump’s vice presidential pick, instead saying he was focused on being governor. He said he laughed when he read Trump’s comments.

“It’s kind of interesting to hear that after the things that were said about me a couple weeks ago,” Walker said. “It’s almost breathtaking that I was listed in the first place.”

}

2140, 11 April 2016

16 Comments

  1. Kevin Scheunemann

    Wow. Just wow.

    I’d find it hard to believe Walker would attach to the Trump crazy train in any manner.

    Trump makes Hillary look honest by comparison…and she is the most dishonest candidate on the planet…

  2. old baldy

    Walker is an opportunist, first and foremost. Live with it.

    “Trump makes Hillary look honest by comparison…and she is the most dishonest candidate on the planet…” Explain how this can be true. Logic would dictate that the statement makes no sense.

  3. Kevin Scheunemann

    Baldy,

    Ever see outer space alien movies?

    I’m convinced Trump’s brain matter resides in outer space from time to time.

    Feel better about the logic?

  4. old baldy

    kev:

    Yes, lots more than you.

    Not a bit. You haven’t said anything logical at all.

  5. Kevin Scheunemann

    Logic is a standard for political discourse when Trump and Hillary are the front runners? And Bernie has a shot as an open socialist?

    Good one.

    That was hilarious.

  6. old baldy

    kev:

    If you can explain your logic in your illogical statement,

    “Trump makes Hillary look honest by comparison…and she is the most dishonest candidate on the planet”, please do…

    Hint: If you want to be taken seriously in these discussions, you should put a little thought into what you say. Just spouting off stream of consciousness gibberish or sound bites you heard on rush doesn’t make you any more believable.

  7. Kevin Scheunemann

    Baldy,

    So once in a while, I can’t make a Trump-like statement in describing Hillary, or Trump?

    Duly noted.

    You just want to take the fun out of everything…

  8. old baldy

    kev:

    Nope, I’m a pretty fun loving guy. But if you want to be taken seriously, and you sure put on that persona, you need to be factual and be able to back up your claims with fact. Otherwise you are just another trump wannabe.

    So how does making a “trump-like statement” reconcile with your visceral dislike for him? Must be another one of those privileges of being a selective conservative.

  9. Kevin Scheunemann

    Baldy, taking political corectness to a whole new level.

    It’s difficult to explain the corruption of both Trump and Hillary in a political correct manner.

    You will just have to live with my political incorrect statement about the absurdity of these 2 jokers rising to the top..

  10. old baldy

    kev:

    You made a statement that is logically impossible, yet continue to beat that dead horse. You are always politically incorrect, uninformed and usually defiantly ignorant. No you want to claim silly stupid as well. Go for it all, buddy.

  11. Kevin Scheunemann

    Baldy,

    Let me get this straight:

    You can say “Walker is an opportunist, first and foremost. Live with it”, without any logic in elaboration….but you want to insult my statement about Trump and Hillary as “silly” and “stupid”, or “defiantly ignorant”?

    I didn’t like your blind, untrue, statement about Walker, but I don’t run around insulting you as “silly, stupid, or definatly ignorant” over it.

    Is the difference that it’s OK to insult Walker? And not Trump or Hillary?

    Or is it the fact that Baldy can outlandish statements, and no one else can?

    I’m fascinated by your standard of discourse here.

  12. old baldy

    You are probably fascinated by belly button lint as well.

  13. Kevin Scheunemann

    Baldy,

    If you standard of discourse is really the equivalent of “belly button lint”….

    I could be easily convinced of that.

  14. old baldy

    kev:

    You make statements with every post “without any logic in(sic) elaboration”. Every one of your posts on this thread, for examples. That is the belly button lint I refer to.

  15. Kevin Scheunemann

    Thought we agreed, after your lecture on judging others, you would not be judgmental about my posts?

    You have abandoned that lecture?

    Your shifting standards are interesting.

  16. old baldy

    kev:

    You have never agree with anything I have ever said. You are making stuff up again.

    I wasn’t being judgemental, but descriptive. It was there for all to see.

Pin It on Pinterest