Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...


Everything but tech support.

0831, 26 Sep 15

Clinton Lied About Turning Over All Emails

I know it’s shocking to learn (again) that Hillary Clinton is a liar, but she is. And worse, she’s lying about a pretty massive breach of national security.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration has discovered a chain of emails that Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to turn over when she provided what she said was the full record of work-related correspondence as secretary of state, officials told The Associated Press. The disclosure adds to the questions related to the Democratic presidential front-runner’s unusual usage of a private email account and server while in government.

The messages were exchanged with Gen. David Petraeus when he led the military’s U.S. Central Command, responsible for running the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They began before Clinton entered office and continued into her first days at the State Department. They largely pertained to personnel matters and don’t appear to deal with highly classified material, officials said, but their existence challenges Clinton’s claim that she has handed over the entirety of her work emails from the account.



0831, 26 September 2015


  1. steveegg

    So the question now is how long does Team SCOAMT give Clinton to “quietly” drop out before issuing charges? I give that until Halloween.

  2. Steve Austin

    When this first hit back in March, I assumed that Hillary would have truly wiped the server clean and that once Trey Gowdy got possession of it, that it would only have traces of personal yoga emails. At that point Hillary would get a PR boost from the whole thing, saying the server data proves the vast right wing conspiracy over-reacted to the whole thing.

    Little did I know she was so incompetent that she actually didn’t properly wipe this thing. Or that she was stupid enough to actually have classified emails on it.

    I recall Rush back in March saying the server existence and content was being exposed by Obama’s people in an attempt to knock her out so a more suitable liberal could run. One who would sign on to Obama’s executive orders and agenda 100% without question. He was right.

    Welcome President Biden, Sanders or Squaw Warren.

  3. Fairs Fare

    I’m not a Clinton fan and have repeatedly said she won’t get my vote. However, this is turning into a witch hunt. It has more to do with trying to discredit her campaign then it does about any real concerns about national security. I think Clinton did break the law and I think her attempt to control emails was intentional. Three years later… either charge her or get over it. Big Joe is going to be the democratic nominee anyway so who cares.

  4. Owen

    I agree, Steve A., I really assumed that the server’s original hard drives were sitting at the bottom of the Atlantic and it has a fresh, clean, one in there. Thank goodness for incompetence.

  5. Ken McVay

    Hillary Clinton is a lifelong, documented serial liar. Why is that so hard for Americans to understand?

    She belongs in prison, not the WH

  6. scott

    “I recall Rush back in March saying the server existence and content was being exposed by Obama’s people in an attempt to knock her out so a more suitable liberal could run. One who would sign on to Obama’s executive orders and agenda 100% without question. He was right.”


    Really? You think any of that is even remotely true? Whoa.

  7. Dan

    Yeah, well scott, who do you think is releasing all this information to the press? It sure isn’t a Republican or a GOP operative.
    Of course it is Obama and his ilk are releasing the information and they are releasing it too liberal media like the NY Times.
    If you don’t believe this scenario, then what do you believe?

  8. scott

    Forget about how. I’m still working on a motive. “Knock her out [of the race] so a more suitable liberal could run”? First of all, Obama’s a pretty middle of the road establishment guy. The idea that he or his supporters would sabotage another candidate cut from the same political cloth is stupid. Second, who do these ninja Democrats want to clear the way FOR? Where’s the “more suitable liberal” candidate waiting in the wings? There’s Bernie Sanders, I guess. Are you suggesting that Obama’s “people” are covertly helping Sanders?

    No. I’m sorry, none of this makes sense. At all.

  9. Dan

    Scott: 2 words:
    Joe Biden
    I realize that you think all Democrats get along with each love other but it is common knowledge that the Obama’s and Clintons don’t like each other. Hate may be a good word for their relationship.
    Obama wants someone who will carry on his legacy and Clinton won’t.
    But you probably know that already because you are not a stupid person. You will vote for Hillary no matter what, even if she is indicted. There is nothing that Hillary could do for you for you not to vote for her. She could kill a person or a puppy and you will find a way to justify voting for her.

  10. scott

    We’ll have to agree to disagree, Dan, regarding the plausibility of your theory. All I can say is my bullshit-o-meter is redlining.

    Vote for Hilary in the general “no matter what”? Hm. Mostly true, I guess. And that’s primarily because of the Republican party and its candidates. It and most of them are, shall we say, unencumbered by facts and seem to have no real interest in responsible governance. Still, if Hilary shoots a man in Reno just to watch him die AND the GOP has nominated, say, Pataki or Kasich, I would for the first time vote Republican.

Pin It on Pinterest