Contemptible Holder To Campaign for Neubauer

Eric Holder, the disgraced corrupt former Attorney General who was held in contempt of Congress for withholding information about his gun running into Mexico, will pump money into supporting Neubauer. And she, despite her previous statements blasting special interest money, will gleefully accept it. Nice, eh?

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A group founded by former Democratic U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced Monday that it is spending $350,000 to help liberal-backed candidate Lisa Neubauer get elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates have been active in Wisconsin, spending more than $2 million last year to help liberal candidates, including Supreme Court candidate Rebecca Dallet and Democrat Tony Evers, who defeated Republican Scott Walker for governor.

[…]

Thompson noted that Neubauer has been critical of outside spending on court races in the past.

“Now she’s happy to accept it,” Thompson said. “The key question is, ‘What’s changed?'”

46 Responses to Contemptible Holder To Campaign for Neubauer

  1. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    If there was ever a reason to vote Hagedorn, this is it.

  2. jjf says:

    I saw a tweet this morning about the weak number of endorsements of Hagedorn.  Where’s all the active judges and attorneys?  I know at least one hard-core Republican sheriff missing from the list.

  3. Le Roi du Nord says:

    jjf:

    I looked over that list of endorsements.  Our former (by several terms) sheriff is on the list.  He is a friend, so I asked him.  He said he never endorses judges at any level because of potential conflicts of interest.  None of our county judges are on the list either.   Something dishonest going on here….

  4. jjf says:

    So a reporter should look into that, Le Roi.  Would make an interesting story, if true.

  5. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    jjf, Nord,

    But we should not look into the dark money and disgraced former AG/criminal stumping for Neubauer?

    Typical liberals.

  6. Pat says:

    Kevin said, “But we should not look into the dark money and disgraced former AG…”

    Sure, let’s look into all of it. So far it looks like someone is posting false endorsements for one candidate and, well, let’s see……..what else????

  7. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    Disgraced/criminal campaign stumping with dark money is 100 times worse.

    They are not equivalent.

  8. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    I said sure they should look into it. You evidently have some facts about dark money. Please share.

  9. Pat says:

    Oh, and please share your knowledge of criminal activity in the Neubauer campaign.

  10. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    PAt,

    Any liberal backed money is “dark money”.

  11. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    I was referring to Eric Holder stumping on their behalf.

  12. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    Ok, so you don’t have anything beyond hyperbolic rhetoric?

  13. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    Not hyperbolie if Neubauer campaign does not denounce Eric Holder’s efforts on their behalf.

  14. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    Well, so far I haven’t seen any wrong doing activity by the Neubauer campaign. Do you have anything?

  15. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    A criminal, like Holder, pumping money into her campaign?

    If her campaign was honest, she would denounce this dark money.

    But Nord, who has made false accusations in the past…you want to look into that wild accusation?

    Wow.

  16. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    That would be “no” then.

    And, what the heck does Nord have to do with any of this??

  17. Merlin says:

    Criticizing one of the Left’s lesser gods is bad form, doncha know.

  18. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    He was the one that asserted the fake endorsement.

  19. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    When you speak of “ Dark Money”, is that the money that pours into campaigns as a resulted from the Citizens United Supreme Court decision?

  20. jjf says:

    I don’t get it.  Dem money is “dark” and mysterious, all the funding that funnels to GOP candidates is what?  Are you opposed to out-of-state money?  Why?

  21. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    That would be a “yes” then.

    Please join me in condemning Citizens United.

  22. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Pat,

    “Dark” because of the awful former AG behind the money.

    He was a criminal that armed terrorists and criminals recklessly.

  23. Le Roi du Nord says:

    k:

    Was Holder convicted of any crimes?  Can you provide the details on those convictions for us all?  Thanks.

     

  24. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Nord,

    His crimes were obvious.

    Arming criminals and terrorists.

    Just because he is not yet convicted does not mean he is not reprehensible.

    He is still unrepentant.

  25. jjf says:

    Wow, judge, jury, executioner, Dilly Bar maker.  And the ol’ Christian murder all you want, repent on your deathbed, it’s OK with everyone.  So moral!

  26. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Jjf,

    I did not say anything about execution. Just discerning good and evil.

    I understand you are just dandy with Eric Holder giving heavy firearms to drug cartels, child traffickers, and terrorists that hurt a ton of people.

    He could at least apologize. The Neubauer campaign should demand he apologize if they are going to align with this thug.

    But you are OK with evil.

    I understand where you come down, we cannot look for you to stick up for what is good and right.

    I just expect that after a while.

  27. jjf says:

    No execution?  Just a pit of fire, right?

    If Holder did that, oh, I’d say I’d be just as mad as when Reagan did it.

    Do you have any sense of how silly you sound when you claim that someone is “OK with evil”?

  28. Le Roi du Nord says:

    jjf:

    I’m sure folks like Ollie North and ronnie raygun are on k’s pantheon of saints for arming murdering terrorists.

  29. jjf says:

    Oh, they’ve asked for forgiveness, so that’s in the past.  It’s time to move forward.

  30. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Nord,

    Are any of them stumping for Hagedorn?

    Stop it with your insane liberal false equivalency.

    It is more annoying than flaming poop on the porch.

  31. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Well, I know ronnie isn’t.  ollie is probably sipping rum punch in central america and isn’t interested in some intolerant religious fanatic in WI.

  32. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Again Nord,

    Neither is stumping for a candidate in this Supreme Court race.

    You are a monkey that cannot help but fling your poo, but you end up hitting yourself with it.

  33. Le Roi du Nord says:

    k:

    And you have no defense except calling others names.  What a sad little man you are.

    We disagree, get over it.  Your name calling and juvenile antics will never persuade me to side with you.  You have had plenty of chances to use a strong argument to defend you positions, yet you always, every time, take the low road.

  34. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Nord,

    Your comments have nothing to do with election.

    My comment about your monkeyism is tame.

  35. jjf says:

    Yeah, but if we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?

  36. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Jjf,

    Liberals don’t evolve. They rot in moral decay.

  37. jjf says:

    Gosh, Kevin, you are the spitting image of Christ these days.

  38. Le Roi du Nord says:

    “Liberals don’t evolve”.  Not true, I voted for nixon in ’72.  I evolved for the better over the years.

    I’ll put my morals up against yours or t-rumps any day.

  39. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Jjf,

    Far from perfect, but I try.

  40. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Nord,

    Didn’t vote for Reagan?

  41. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Nope, smart folks could see he was a senile old anti-science, anti-environment B film actor right from the git-go.  And he didn’t disappoint.

    And you didn’t vote for him either.

  42. Pat says:

    Kevin,

    Did you vote for Reagan?

  43. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Nord,

    Then your “evolution” was a bad mutuation.

    Pat,

    I was too young to vote for Reagan, but supported Reagan in my grade school straw poll.

    I was a smart kid.

  44. Le Roi du Nord says:

    k:

    For someone who doesn’t believe in evolution that is a strange comment.  Once again you are fluid in your beliefs, but always confident that you alone are right, and everyone else is wrong.

  45. jjf says:

    Kevin, mostly I think you have all the Christ-like subtle nature of a crazed street preacher who’s looking for attention in Times Square or on a college campus.

  46. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    jjf,

    Appreciate the compliment…such as it was.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.