It’s interesting how the reporter in this story frames the story.
The U.S. Supreme Court could announce as soon as Monday how it’s handling a landmark legal fight over Wisconsin’s gerrymandered political map, which has helped lock in legislative majorities for the GOP since it took power in 2011.
The key legal question: Can a set of political districts be so stacked toward one party that it violates the Constitution?
Until the court speaks, that is unsettled law.
But while the law is uncertain, the politics are quite clear.
Legislative boundaries like Wisconsin’s present a stark civics question:
How meaningful are elections when control of the legislature in a competitive state is largely predetermined by the way the districts are drawn?
One might also ask, “how meaningful are elections when the party that is elected to control the legislature is stripped of the power to draw districts as they have done for the last 150 years?”
I guess we’ll see.