It’s the Friday before a holiday weekend, so it’s time for partisan government agencies to dump documents that they don’t want anyone to notice.
Just read it. Even you lefties… just read it. The only rational conclusions are that Hillary Clinton is either a lying crook or that she’s a blithering idiot. Is that who you really want as president?
Awful. Just awful.
Let the Nord “Hillary obstruction of justice” denial commmence….
Liar or idiot. After reading the FBI report I’m saying she was being an idiot.
I just don’t buy that a bar trained lawyer can be that dumb about something so important.
If we assume a bar trained lawyer can be that dumb, she is most unqualified candidate ever to run for president.
Please define “bar trained lawyer”. And where would that put Nixon?
“Bar trained lawyer”= went to an accredited law school.
Nixon had to resign for his obstruction of justice.
Why not just say that rather than make up something without definition ?
I would wager that Bush II was just as unqualified.
“Bar trained lawyer” is fairly common lingo.
Bush II never had to lie to FBI multiple times, knew what classified info was, and was not stupid enough to destroy evidence, or use a private, ubsecured mail server for classified documents.
That makes him an Einstein next to Hillary.
No, it isn’t. Lawyers are trained in school and as interns, etc., and trained before they become members of the bar.
Einstein, har har.
They are trained by bar association, by members of the legal bar, at accredited law schools.
What is the big deal?
She was trained as a lawyer.
She should know before acting on anything!
My grandfather was an attorney and judge, my uncle was an attorney, yet I never once in all the years I was around them and other lawyers, did I ever heard them use that term, “Bar trained lawyer”. They were trained at IU or UW, not at the bar. They had to take a test to be admitted to the bar, so the training was prior.
The big deal is you fabricate things all the time to prove a point. Why not try the truth some time?
So ask your relatives if they are “bar trained lawyers”…and see what they say.
They will say “of course”.
Yes, I fabricate simple english.
In normal circumstances, that FBI interview is enough to be disbarred.
“They will say “of course”.”
No, they won’t.
“In normal circumstances, that FBI interview is enough to be disbarred”. No, it isn’t.
Bill Clinton was disbarred for lying under oath.
Lying to FBI is worse…that is obstruction of justice vs. mere Bill Clinton perjury.
Both get you disbarred.
OK, I’ll say what I have always said; that if you can charge, prove and convict or disbar HC (or anyone else), go for it. I’m all for enforcing the law as written. But if all you have is your uninformed opinion to make accusations then you really don’t enhance your credibility.
FYI: Folks in the Bush administration, including GWB, lied to the American public regarding WMDs and the invasion of Iraq. Some were under oath. What are your feelings about that scenario that ended up costing thousands of US soldiers their lives?
” But if all you have is your uninformed opinion to make accusations then you really don’t enhance your credibility.”
That did not stop the liberal machine of making poor conservative people guilty, through the Chisolm mob, of mere speech.
Owen posted the evidence of crime, you just ignore it.