Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

Owen

Everything but tech support.
}

2126, 22 Apr 25

Leftist Prosecutor Refuses to Prosecute Man for Felony Property Damage for Political Reasons

This is unconscionable. Our two-tier justice system is alive and well in Minnesota. This goon is caught on video causing tens of thousands of dollars of property damage – damage that the citizens of her county will have to pay to repair out of their own pockets – and she refuses to prosecute because she agrees with the goon’s political cause. If you live in Hennepin County, you cannot rely on the “justice” system to prosecute criminals who are part of the political Left.

Hennepin County officials are not charging the man accused of damaging several Tesla vehicles in Minneapolis.

 

Authorities arrested Dylan Adams for keying six Teslas, with the damage valued at $21,000.

 

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty decided not to file charges against Adams, referring him to an adult diversion program.

}

2126, 22 April 2025

6 Comments

  1. Tuerqas

    If a prosecutor gets a case concerning her brother who murdered a sports star on security footage, does she get to just refuse to prosecute? No recourse, man walks free? Now we can see why every Prosecutor and judge should be ‘conservative’. Today, progressive, activist, leftist all mean the same thing in law. It means that the personal feelings of the judge, or prosecutor are in effect the law of that area. Conservative simply means they follow the rule of law. A crime is a crime whether it is committed by a white man or a black trans woman choosing to be a man for a day.
    How everyone does not want a judge or prosecutor who will base their decisions on the law and known facts of the case beggars my mind.
    How everyone doesn’t want to at least stop the deficit from increasing further blows my mind even more deeply.
    How everyone doesn’t want kids to get the education we all pay a LOT for just pisses me off.

    There is no shred of a rational explanation for lefty beliefs anymore.

  2. jonnyv

    No. You don’t prosecute every single person who breaks any law. You would be wasting city resources.

    You make sure that these people are made whole for the damages. A statement from a spokesperson.

    “Our main priorities are to secure restitution for the victims and hold Mr. Adams accountable. As a result, we will file for pre-charge diversion to best facilitate both of those goals,” HCAO spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping wrote in a statement on Monday. “This is an approach taken in many property crime cases and helps to ensure the individual keeps their job and can pay restitution, as well as reducing the likelihood of repeat offenses. Criminal prosecution remains a possibility should unlawful behavior continue.”

    And assuming this is a first time non-violent offense, this makes sense.

    Owen skews and lies. Or is incompetent in gathering facts.

  3. MjM

    Owen skews and lies. Or is incompetent in gathering facts.

    The lies and incompetence are all yours, Pedo JV….

    A 19-year-old Robbinsdale woman with no criminal record was charged with first-degree felony property damage on Monday after she allegedly keyed her coworker’s car at the White Castle in Brooklyn Park. The damage to the car was estimated at $7,000. She is due to make her first court appearance in two weeks.

    When asked how she could balance that charging decision with the decision to not charge Adams, Moriarty didn’t directly respond. She said her office’s main goal is to hold the person accountable for keying the car, get restitution to the people affected, and avoid felony convictions when possible, because it can waylay someone’s life. She said all of that will happen in Adams’ case, and if he fails to complete the diversion program criminal charges will be filed.

    “Should we have treated this gentleman differently because it’s a political issue?” Moriarty asked. “We made this decision because it is in the best interest of public safety.”

    Note her stupid stance: “it’s a political issue”.

    No, it is a criminal issue. The “”political issue” is Moriarty’s failure to do her job because the criminal’s political views aligns with her’s.

  4. jonnyv

    There isn’t enough details around the other situation for me to make a call on that. IF it is similar, then the 19 y.o. should get the same treatment.

    It doesn’t change the fact that Owen lied (or didn’t research) that this guy was paying the money and NOT the owners of the cars. And made it sound like he was getting off without paying.

    I am not denying that this guy is getting preferential treatment due to his position and who he knows.

  5. MjM

    There isn’t enough details around the other situation for me to make a call on that.

    The details are simple. The girl keyed a car. Got caught. Got charged. That’s the way it should work in all cases.

    Funny how you lie about knowing the details of the Tesla Twat while proudly making the call for that one.

    For instance, you don’t know that Moriarty stepped WAY outside her own official standards for charging property crimes….

    _________________________________________________________________________________
    Diversion guidelines
    Eligibility

    The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office determines diversion eligibility and has discretion to refer participants. Program requirements include, but are not limited to:

    4th and 5th degree felony possession;
    Property crimes of less than $5,000;
    No prior felonies;
    No prior diversion;
    No possession of a firearm or dangerous weapon;
    Offense does not involve violence.
    ——————————————————————————————————

    Moriarty charged a 19-yr old mad-at-BF girlie for 7 Gs damage AFTER letting a 33-yr old Democrap g’vment worker who did 3 times the damage walk away with class assignments.

  6. Tuerqas

    >No. You don’t prosecute every single person who breaks any law. You would be wasting city resources.

    Captain obvious strikes again!!! (Or is it Captain stupidity?) So what is your point? It’s okay to commit crimes if you are good for it, assuming you did get caught and anyone ever does make you pay it back? It’s okay to shoplift for years and when you finally get caught, it is all good if you just give the merch back from that episode? Is it okay to shoot someone in the leg if you pay the medical bills or destroy their transportation so long as you give them a ride to work the next day? That is basically what you are saying. That all fits with today’s courts I guess. If you are wealthy enough or know the right wealthy people you are largely immune from lawful prosecution, especially if liberal ideals were part of the reasoning for the crime.

    So to summarize your views based on your words, we all agree that if a white conservative man commits a felony level crime he should be prosecuted based upon the facts of the case, but if he is liberal he should probably either just be let off or asked to make amends to the victim(s). You did not help the image of liberal incapability to be rational with anything you said above. No rational person is going to look at the case in the post and say “No. You don’t prosecute every single person who breaks any law. You would be wasting city resources.” The only way to take that is that you are saying flat out that this, the case in the post above, is one that should not be prosecuted. That is what you actually mean, correct?

    Sorry, but violence and vandalism in a supposedly free country based purely on political differences should be prosecuted harder than for other reasons. We should all have freedom of beliefs without fear of violence or vandalism. As a liberal you are against freedom of belief. We should all believe as liberals do or we can expect or must accept some sort of violence to be done upon us and no prosecution will follow. That is fascism and that is what you believe in. And nope, not putting words in your mouth, just basing conclusions on the things you have said and what liberals that you agree with or make excuses for have said and done.

    As a liberal, your view of law is valueless. You have already weighed in on Portland (and other cities) rioting not being prosecuted, but you were ok with the 1/6 rioting being aggressively prosecuted. Why? Because the lib rioters were told to riot about a single death of a black man so all good little libs are okay with it. Your commentary here is just more of the same. Liberal judges and prosecutors are not following the law and you support that. It takes a dangerously stupid (or programmed person:) to support prosecution decisions based on political views. Liberals are lockstep on the issue and as they can’t all be that stupid, there must be some other reason. This is why you get the programmed label from me so often. It makes no sense that you are ALL that stupid, and you all parrot back the same excuses and platitudes, so programmed to believe specific sources is a much more logical explanation than just stupidity. And those sources are lying to you every single day, huh, just like you are calling Owen a liar for omitting that paying some of it back has been agreed to, like that is all that should happen to that person. Liberals all give the same reasons/excuses on every issue (always matching the LSM rhetoric), much closer explanations than 2 witnesses of the same crime in most every case. How else do you explain how close all the liberal rhetoric is so identical when we can’t trust the testimony of 2 people witnessing the same crime so often?

    And talk about wasting resources, very few (if any?) liberal rioters in the last 2 decades have been seriously prosecuted for the billions in damages they caused. The one ‘conservative riot’ at the capital on 1/6 causing about 2.7 million cost 10s of millions to prosecute so far. A liberal judge or prosecutor gives excuses for political liberals or illegal immigrant felons today based on their own political feelings and damn the law. That should not be acceptable to anyone. Neither should anyone be for a political system that pays out trillions more than it takes in. Everyone should be for DOGE except the ones specifically affected, I guess. Those are just a few of the reasons why I say that today it is more clear than ever that liberals today are not rational thinkers and that the most logical reason for it is programming.

Submit a Comment

Pin It on Pinterest