Jacob Blake Pleads Not Guilty


From his hospital bed, Blake pleaded not guilty to a previous felony, third-degree sexual assault, as well as misdemeanor criminal trespass and disorderly conduct.

Blake, 29, is accused in court documents of sexually assaulting a woman in her home on May 3, stealing her Ford Explorer and debit card, and making two fraudulent ATM withdrawals for $500, WGN9 reported.

97 Responses to Jacob Blake Pleads Not Guilty

  1. Kevin Scheunemann says:

    Where are charges for assaulting 3 police officers?

    Liberals cheer that lack of charging.

    Nord, are you outraged Blake did not get charged with abusing those officers?


  2. Mar says:

    Gee, I thought Blake was just this innocent bystander.
    Nope, just a thug in a wheelchair.

  3. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Gee, nothing like putting your lack of knowledge of the legal process on full display. Congrats.

  4. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    Care to share?

  5. Mar says:

    I don’t know about assault charges, but resisting arrest certainly should have been charged.

  6. Le Roi du Nord says:


    If you don’t already know your errors there isn’t much I can do to teach you. You would be best served to remain silent rather than prove yourself the fool.

  7. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    I’m seriously curious why you are not upset about lack of charges for assaulting law enforecment officers here yet?

    Are you pro-law enforecement? or pro-criminal on this?

  8. Merlin says:

    The charges in question are from Blake’s previous criminal activity in Racine. He hasn’t been charged with anything in Kenosha yet.

  9. Le Roi du Nord says:


    Why you ask? Because I understand the process, you don’t. And never will.

  10. Mar says:

    Le Roi, you have no clue how the process works.
    Which is probably a good thing because that means you never got into trouble and spent time in prison.

  11. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    Its cut and dried.

    Blake should be charged with resiting arrest and assault of the officers?

    Don’t you agree?

  12. Le Roi du Nord says:

    No k, it isn’t. And who said he wouldn’t be charged? Your false assumptions, and jumping to conclusions don’t serve you well.


    At least I know Keith Hernandez isn’t a murderer.

  13. dad29 says:

    IIRC both the WI A.G. and the Kenosha PD are conducting investigations of the Blake event; the D.A. will be getting a report from WI A.G. and acting on it.

    Another question:  why is Grosskreutz still running around without being charged for assault with a deadly weapon following the VIDEOTAPED incident when he pulled a pistol and aimed it at Kyle before Kyle, in self-defense, shot his arm near-off?

    Best guess:  KPD didn’t see the incident at the time.  But that’s not an excuse for the D.A., is it?

  14. Mar says:

    Yes Le Roi, and you believe Easter is a national Holiday and that you don’t lie.

  15. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Wrong again, mar. But you are used to it.

  16. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    But do you believe Blake should be charged?

    Will you stand by the officers here?


  17. Mar says:

    Pathological Liar Le Roi lying again.
    Good thing you are Pinocchio otherwise your nose would be visiting me here in Arizona while the rest of you is catching mosquitoes in Wisconsin.

  18. Le Roi du Nord says:


    It isn’t my decision to charge, or not charge, or what charges to file. Nor is it yours. It is up to the DA and the PD based on the evidence. As an elected official you should know that. Perhaps the voters in your municipality aren’t getting their money’s worth.

  19. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    So you show no courage to support these officers?

    If these were my officers, I would stand by them, apologize for out horrible governor, give them a medal and a courage award.

    What would you do?

    Allow leftists to continue to rip them for actions of a criminal?

    Your support of law enforcement is pathetic when it counts.

  20. Mar says:

    Wrong again, Le Roi.
    Actually, the decision to charge is not up to the cops.
    The cops present evidence to the DA and then the DA charges or does not charge.
    It is the District Attorney’s call.
    And here I thought you knew the judicial process.
    Guess not.

  21. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Splitting hairs there mar, both are involved.


    If they were “your” officers, you would know the process. Looks like even mar does.

  22. Mar says:

    Once again, Le Roi shows his ignorance. Assuming he is a he.
    But that is not what you said.
    But you had a job supporting law enforcement.
    Perhaps you were a trustee, washing police cars, when not in jail.
    Nothing wrong with, that mind you. Good job experience.

  23. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    If these were my officers with that film evidence, I would not let them twitch in front of liberal mob.

    I woul support them against evil criminals and evil leftist mob.

    Why don’t you? You claim to be pro police.

    Or is that a lie you tell yourself to swallow your awful anti-police ideology?

  24. Mar says:

    Le Roi is not pro police nor supports law enforcement.
    And he supports thugs, rioters and looters.

  25. MjM says:

    Mar sez: “And [Nazi Nort] supports thugs, rioters and looters.“

    You could have just written “Democrats”.

  26. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Geez, you guys really don’t have a clue. I can’t help you out here. Call the DA and ask him, or the Chief.

  27. Mar says:

    Another fool who thinks they know everything but in reality, know nothing.

  28. jjf says:

    So if I were Mar, and had his personality, is the point where I would make some kind of joke about the abilities of Walmart employees?

  29. Mar says:

    Gee, jjf, are you into job shaming?

  30. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    That is not a pro police position…not even close.

    Awful. Just awful.

  31. jjf says:

    Not at all, Mar.  Just pointing out that you do.

  32. Mar says:

    jjf, show me where I disparage a job or employee without cause.

  33. Le Roi du Nord says:


    How so k? Be specific.

  34. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    I asked for you to support these 3 officers openly that were asaaulted by Blake.

    Instead, you gave me a “wait for investigation” approach.

    That is not supportive of law enforcement, especially when they were facing this violent, resisting criminal…and did a good job keeping innocents from getting hurt!

  35. jjf says:

    Cause?  Or intent?  If I saw a news article about a Walmart greeter who committed a crime, would I have cause to mention your name and ask your whereabouts?

  36. Mar says:

    Oh, ok jjf.
    I guess you don’t understand sarcasm, humor and you have extremely thin skin.
    If I offended you, I am sorry

  37. Mar says:

    By the way, I don’t work for Walmart but I have family that does, so you would be going after my family. Which I thought you agreed is off limits.

  38. Le Roi du Nord says:


    And again you exhibit your lack of knowledge . Bravo!!

  39. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    So you are toomuch of a coward to openly support law enforcement in Blake case?

    Not very”pro law enforcement”.

    I call it “anti-law enforcement” if you fail to support the officers at this point.


  40. Jason says:

    >And again you exhibit your lack of knowledge .

    Good one Leroy, you never show your work or your knowledge. Keep trying to distract from your shortcomings.

  41. Jason says:

    >Which I thought you agreed is off limits.

    Nothing is off limits to a liberal fuck stain who goes so far as to create a “parody” blog to insult Owen, Jed, Wendy, and everyone who posts here. The Neck Beard is the biggest piece of shit here.

  42. Le Roi du Nord says:


    Unlike you, I am consistent in my support for law enforcement and our legal system. I don’t need to be selective like you. Nor do I bow to wannabe authoritarian bullies like you.


    Your issue is with retention of knowledge, not me failing to provide sources. If you folks decline the opportunity to get smarter, that is all on you.

  43. Mar says:

    Interesting tha Le Roi wants to wait for the investigation of the rapist.
    But when came to the Chinese virus, he believed everything the so called scientists said, even before what they said was true or not.
    Or if what the so-called scientists said was political.
    And if it involved President Trump and it hurt Trump he believed it no matter what.

  44. Le Roi du Nord says:

    No mar, what is tragic is your denial of the value of evidence, and relying on trumps BS.

  45. Mar says:

    Just more deranged hate from Le Roi.
    And just for the record, you were wrong on just about everything about the Chinese virus.
    Just like you are wrong about just about everything else.

  46. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    So you leave poor officers twitch at hands of liberal mob instead of sticking up for them upfront?

    You are NOT a friend of law enforcement with that attitude. Especially here.

    Awful. Just awful.

  47. MjM says:

    And today Camela Harris told the serial sexual assaulter she was proud of him….

    “Sen. Harris had an inspirational and uplifting one-hour visit with Jacob Blake, Jr. and his family today. She spoke individually with each family member about how they were handling the trauma and urged them to take care of their physical and mental health. In a moving moment, Jacob Jr. told Sen. Harris that he was proud of her, and the senator told Jacob that she was also proud of him and how he is working through his pain. Jacob Jr. assured her that he was not going to give up on life for the sake of his children. ” statement from Ben Crump, Patrick Salvi II and B’Ivory LaMarr, attorneys for the serial sexual assaulter.

    (Ben Crump is the same ‘civil rights” hack that perpetrated massive fraud on the courts in the Trayvon Martin case.)

    James Woods nails it: https://mobile.twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/1298330729890242561

  48. Mar says:

    MjM, did Willie Brown’s whore happen to meet with the rapist’s victim?
    Hmm, I wonder why not?

  49. jjf says:

    Mar, go on, explain the joke.  Tell me why it’s funny, tell me why we should or shouldn’t ridicule your family.

    And Jason dives to the bottom of the barrel and come up with several handfuls.

  50. Le Roi du Nord says:

    “twitch at hands of liberal mobs” .

    What are you saying here, k?? There is no twitching going on. And yet another display of your lack of knowledge of the investigative process.

  51. Pat says:

    “Willie Brown’s whore”

    People have to be extraordinarily scared that their preferred candidate will lose the election to stoop that low.

  52. jjf says:

    Oh but Pat, Mar will tell others that they are the ones who have all the racist and sexist thoughts, and that he alone holds the ability to detect and discern.

  53. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    So you will not express 1 word of support for these Kenosha officers right now?


  54. Le Roi du Nord says:


    Exactly. Ditto the earlier ”pee pads and knee pads”, comment. Not like they proved anything other than their juvenile mentalities.

  55. Mar says:

    Aww, did I hurt your little feelings, jjf? What a strange reaction.
    Maybe there is some truth about IT people being off mentally, where they feel the need to riot, loot and act racist or supports those who do those things when they get out of basement.

  56. Mar says:

    Gee, I must of stuck a nerve when I called out Senator Harris for being a whore for being Willie Brown’s girlfriend when he was married and then got 2 patronage jobs.
    Too bad buttercups, suck it up.

  57. jjf says:

    Mar, you’ve lost it.  Why are you worried about my feelings?  You didn’t intend to insult and bully?  And then you run to a “joke” about IT?  Tell me why it’s funny.

    Wait’ll you learn about Newt.  Or Trump.  Are they “whores” too, or do you just save that zinger for women?

  58. Le Roi du Nord says:


    And he is worried about “patronage jobs”.  Ha!  Look at the trump clan of patronage grifters, crooks, and scam artists. Amazing display of hypocrisy on mars’ part.


    I have answered you dozens of times.  It is a waste of my time to talk sense to you.

  59. Mar says:

    “Wait’ll you learn about Newt.  Or Trump.  Are they “whores” too, or do you just save that zinger for women?”
    Yes, they are whores as well, though, I am not sure they slept with people to get ahead like Harris.
    Did President Trump or Gingrich get patronage jobs from the women they slept with?

  60. Pat says:

    “Did President Trump or Gingrich get patronage jobs from the women they slept with?“

    I’m not sure they got patronage jobs. But I’m pretty sure they each received a job of some sort.

  61. Pat says:

    So what if Harris dated someone who had been estranged from his wife for a period of time?

  62. jjf says:

    Mar, why are you worried about my feelings?  You didn’t intend to insult and bully?  And then you run to a “joke” about IT?  Tell me why it’s funny.

  63. Mar says:

    “So what if Harris dated someone who had been estranged from his wife for a period of time?”
    And you have the same view of Trump and Gingrich?

  64. Mar says:

    Get over yourself, jjf.

  65. Pat says:


    You’re answering a question with a question. You go first.

  66. Mar says:

    Gee Pat, you are an expert on those kind of answers.
    And now you call someone out on it?
    You are so darn dishonest.
    But unlike you, I will answer: Don’t care. But the anti-Trump people like yourself,always complained about his womanizing.
    But when with Harris, oh, never mind, or how sexist to bring it up.
    What hypocrites.

  67. Pat says:

    “I will answer: Don’t care.“

    Then why say, “Willie Brown’s whore”, if you don’t care? It sounds like you are lying, and you do care. Evidently a lot.

  68. Mar says:

    I like to see you liberal’s head explode with fake horror.
    You don’t respect women. Neither does Le Roi or jjf.
    Otherwise you would have called out Whore Harris for meeting with Rapist Jacob instead of meeting with Rapist Jacob’s victim?
    And you still didn’t answer my question.
    What a loser.

  69. Pat says:

    I never slur shamed Newt or Trump.

  70. jjf says:

    I think I see the pattern – and the true answer to Mar’s question.

    Mar calls a woman a “whore.”  He’s excited about the word, finds it ever so titillating to rouse the Libs this way, and then when we give him what he wants (the attention to his insult) he turns it around and claims we are the sexist ones.

    Did I get it right?

  71. Mar says:

    Still refuse to answer the question, right Pat?
    Why not?
    Are you that weak. It’s a very simple question.

  72. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Well I certainly respect women more than mar and trump. But that is a pretty low bar to step over.

    BTW: I have never, ever called any woman a whore. But it looks like mar has a lot of experience. Sad.

  73. Mar says:

    Pretty much jjf, you got it right because you guys are hypocrites.
    And why cannot men be whores?
    Now, who is being sexist?

  74. Mar says:

    Gee, Le Roi, with your hatred of President Trump, you have called all him sorts of nasty names.
    But someone calls a liberal a name, well, that’s bad.
    And yet, Le Roi, you don’t even acknowledge the victim of Rapist Jacob.
    And you say you care about women?
    What a bunch of crap.

  75. Pat says:

    Mar asked, “And you have the same view of Trump and Gingrich?“

    My answer is no.

  76. Mar says:

    Thank you for your answer, Pat.
    It’s a hypocritical answer, but it is an answer nonetheless.
    Thank you.

  77. Pat says:


    As soon as Harris has as many affairs while being married, as many sexual assault allegations, and payoffs to porn stars, I hold her to the exact same standard.

    I don’t have an issue with Harris dating someone between 1994-1995 with an individual who had been estranged from his wife for 10 years.

    I’m glad you don’t either. So it confuses me why you call her a whore.

  78. jjf says:

    In Mar’s world, if you date someone, you’re a “whore.”  And he thinks men are called whores just as often as women.

    Back to the dictionary, I guess!  I wonder which he meant.  Because he’s subtle like that.

    whore noun \ ˈhȯr  , ˈhu̇r  \ plural whores

    1 somewhat old-fashioned : a person who engages in sexual intercourse for pay : PROSTITUTE

    2 offensive : a promiscuous or immoral woman

    3: a male who engages in sexual acts for money

    4: a venal or unscrupulous person

  79. Mar says:

    “1 somewhat old-fashioned : a person who engages in sexual intercourse for pay : PROSTITUTE
    2 offensive : a promiscuous or immoral woman”
    Thank you for making my point, jjf.
    Very well done.

  80. jjf says:

    Mar, so how do you know all these details of Harris’ relationship?

    Why are your feelings hurt by what she might have done?

    Who else is a “whore” in your world?

  81. Le Roi du Nord says:


    Were you the highly educated guy you claim to be you would know that in the great USA you are innocent until proven guilty. That goes for the accused Blake, as well as the officers involved. Blake isn’t a rapist until found guilty, nor are the officers. A smart guy would know that.

  82. Mar says:

    Gee, Le Roi, why don’t you give the benefit of the doubt to other people, say, President Trump.
    But I guess when you are a hater of law enforcement, President Trump and conservatives, on top of being a Liar, you just cannot help yourself.

  83. Mar says:

    “Mar, so how do you know all these details of Harris’ relationship?”
    Reading about it on news sites.
    “Why are your feelings hurt by what she might have done?”
    Doesn’t hurt my feelings. Just pointing out the hypocrisy on the left.
    “Who else is a “whore” in your world?”
    Not enough space, but it includes pedophiles, politicians, clergy, conservatives, liberals etc, but on an individual basis.

  84. Kevin Scheunemann says:


    Point to your open support of these Kenosha officers?

    To count, it has to be more than pretend in your head.

  85. Pat says:

    Mar addresses, “Who else is a “whore” in your world?”
    Not enough space, but it includes pedophiles, politicians, clergy, conservatives, liberals etc, but on an individual basis.


  86. jjf says:

    Pat, wouldn’t it be hypocritical if Mar couldn’t ID any Republicans?

  87. dad29 says:

    PeePad-KneePad.  That’s the Ticket!

  88. Mar says:

    Melania who?

  89. Mar says:

    Why just Republicans, jjf?

  90. Le Roi du Nord says:


    Since when do you get to decide what counts, and what doesn’t ?

  91. Le Roi du Nord says:


    “..why don’t you give the benefit of the doubt to other people, say, President Trump.”

    Is that a question?  If it is, the answer is that we can’t believe him. Like the British airports in the Revolutionary War.

  92. jjf says:

    Are you older than Biden, Dad29?

  93. Mar says:

    I guess that is why we don’t give you the benefit of the doubt either, because you lie so much.
    I guess you and Trump have that in common.

  94. jjf says:

    What?  Trump lies, regularly?  You don’t say!  Does that mean he’s a venal or unscrupulous person?

  95. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Somewhat hypocritical mar, that you would come after me and not trump.

  96. Mar says:

    Le Roi, when President Trump posts here and lies, I will go after him.

  97. Le Roi du Nord says:

    Selective here, too, eh mar?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.