Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...


Everything but tech support.

0721, 25 Jun 19

Governor Evers endorses new era of moral depravity

My column for the Washington County Daily News is online and in print. Here you go:

On Friday afternoon, as people all over Wisconsin were getting ready to enjoy the first official weekend of summer, Gov. Tony Evers vetoed four bills relating to abortion. While it is easy to discuss the vetoes in the context of the political gamesmanship between the Republicans and the Democrats, to do so is facile and fails to fully appreciate the depravity behind the action.

The political angle is simple. In response to radical pro-abortion laws being passed by Democrats in states like New York, Republicans across the country are trying to pass laws to protect the unborn. Both parties are acting to solidify state laws should the United States Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade and cast the responsibility for regulating abortions back to the states.

But behind these bills are the lives of real people. Let us take the four bills that Evers signed one by one.

The first bill would have prevented taxpayers from funding abortion providers through Medicaid. The two political parties have been fighting over this for years. The Republicans argue, rightly, that people who are morally opposed to killing babies in the womb should not be forced to fund organizations that do so. Democrats know that Planned Parenthood is a major financial and rhetorical supporter of the Democratic Party, so they must keep the taxpayer gravy train flowing. Evers vetoed the bill.

The second bill would have required that abortionists provide information that a woman may be able to change her mind and continue her pregnancy even after the first dose of mifepristone, a drug used as part of a drug cocktail to cause an abortion. The information would have been provided as part of the documentation that is already provided by abortionists. Evers vetoed the bill.

These two bills are somewhat procedural and wonkish, but the last two are morally crystal clear.

The third bill would have prohibited a woman from killing her baby based on its race, sex, or disabilities. Evers vetoed the bill. In doing so, Evers affirmed that women should have the ability to abort her baby if she does not like the color of its skin, the baby’s sex, or if the baby is disabled in some fashion. If a mom really wanted a boy but the ultrasound shows a girl, Evers supports her choice to kill the girl and try again. If a baby is shown to have a malformed foot, Evers supports the mom’s choice to kill the baby. If a mom does not want a black baby, Evers supports her choice. In short, Evers supports a woman’s choice to kill her baby even for the most capricious and vain reasons.

The fourth bill passed by the Legislature and vetoed by Governor Evers would have ensured that a baby who survives an abortion receives the same medical care and treatment that any newborn baby would. Sadly, abortionists are very effective, so the odds of a baby surviving an abortion is very rare. But when it does happen, the baby is, by any definition used since the dawn of humankind, born. The baby is outside the womb as a separate human. As such, the baby is entitled to all of the same protection and care as any other person. The fact that the baby survived an attempted abortion is immaterial in terms of the baby’s right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Not according to Governor Evers. According to our governor, a baby who is born and survived an abortion can still be quietly murdered because the abortionist and mother intended to kill it earlier. In Evers’ moral universe, the mother’s desire to kill her baby, even after it has left her body, trumps the baby’s right to exist.

We have come a long way from the old Bill Clinton mantra that abortions should be “safe, legal, and rare.” Now the rabid pro-abortionists like Governors Evers support abortions for any reason — even for anti-disabled, racist, or sexist reasons — up until the time of birth, and even for a while after birth. The moral decrepitude inherent in such a political position is astounding.


0721, 25 June 2019


  1. guinness

    I’m curious what our posting democrats think about this? Care to comment?

  2. dad29


  3. guinness

    Amazing. I was certain a couple of them were Pro Death enough to post supporting comments.

  4. Kevin Scheunemann

    This is what liberals do, spread depravity like a cancer.


  5. MHMaley

    Your boy lost .
    You had plenty of time to pass whatever you liked on abortion .
    The new guy will veto whatever you send up and you know that .

    Good for him and for the women who you want to control .

    Don’t like it ?
    Tough .

  6. Le Roi du Nord

    Exactly, MHM.  walkerfitzvos had 6 years of complete control to pass any abortion law they wanted.  Ditto with the lame-duck stuff.  They never wanted to outlaw abortion or curtail the powers of the governor or AG, but needed a political football to toss around.  Hypocrites through and through.

  7. guinness

    That’s more like it. I knew we’d get a pro-death post sooner or later. How nice that women can make their own choice and kill their babies. Ever consider the vast majority of them had a choice not to get pregnant?

  8. dad29

    Well, whaddya know!!  LeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeRoy speaks the truth.

    There are a few very senior Republicans in both houses who will NEVER seriously cut back on abortion, and they get their way.

    However, when SCOTUS declares that Roe is dead and State laws govern, remember that Wisconsin law, still on the books, prohibits abortion.  That should produce some interesting times in Madistan.

    So the BabyKillers will have to put up with black children again.

  9. jjf

    Come on, Dad29, be brave.  You probably know someone who had an abortion, right?

Pin It on Pinterest