Tag Archives: City of West Bend
Well, that was a short-lived effort.
West Bend will remain chicken-free as officials highlighted their concerns to permit chickens in the area, despite several constituents publicly stating they are in favor of the measure. An ordinance that would modify the municipal code to allow chickens within city limits failed Monday because no other Common Council members would support the motion introduced by Alderman Chris Jenkins. Many highlighted enforcement issues and concerns from residents worried about the smell and noise.
According to the proposed ordinance, individuals who wish to keep chickens must pay for and possess the necessary license, and must keep the area clean, sanitary, and free from odors and vermin.
The ordinance also limits permission to those living in single-family dwellings and owner-occupied duplexes. It states roosters are not permitted at any time and slaughtering animals is not allowed.
The chickens must be kept in a waterproof,
rodent-proof and predator-proof enclosure in a fenced-in area. They cannot be placed in the front yard and have a side and rear yard setback of at least 5 feet. Residents are also not allowed to place the enclosure within 25 feet of any residential structure on an adjacent lot.
Eh, whatever. We have ordinances for nuisances, noise, etc. As long as those are enforced, I don’t have a problem with people keeping chickens. It’s probably less annoying than some folks’ dogs.
Below is a letter that the Mayor of West Bend, Kraig “Sat-on-a-cow” Sadownikow, sent to the council. Watching the city has been a bit boring in the past few years precisely because they have just been being fiscally responsible and good stewards of the taxpayers’ money. Now we are seeing some of the rewards. West Bend is in infinitely better financial shape than almost every other city and the services provided by the city are still more that sufficient. It can be done. Kudos to the mayor, council members, and city staff for their leadership. I’d like to see some of this kind of leadership over at the school district and county…
Hello Council – I know municipal numbers are boring to most people, but the discussion last night about the City’s Fund Balance was really important.
In 2011 and ‘12 we had an 11% Fund Balance. This means 11% of our annual budget was in a reserve account for emergencies. Moody’s Bond Rating Agency along with Baker Tilley, our Financial Consultants recommend a minimum of 17% otherwise our bond rating was in jeopardy. These are not small dollars. Each 1% equates to about $250,000. Moreover many comparable municipalities are in the 25-30% range…….we really had a long way to go.
The Council took action in 2013/14, to put in place a policy that forced us to grow to the minimum of 17% and then requiring public action to drop below that amount in the future. We hit 17% in 2015 and have grown to the 22% we are at now……..basically doubled our reserves in 4 years, adding about $2,500,000. This was accomplished without raising taxes, while also increasing funding for Road Improvements by 40% over the same time, while reducing City debt by over 20%, while maintaining a competitive salary and benefit package for employees and maintaining high quality services for our constituents.
Congratulations and Thank You to all of you along with our staff. This work will begin paying financial dividends in the near future.
Additionally, I took a look at unemployment statistics recently and found that November unemployment was 3.2%…….5th best of the 32 largest communities in the State. Top 3 are usually Sun Prairie, Madison and Fitchburg due to UW and State gov’t…..we beat communities like Neenah, Appleton, Brookfield, etc. In March of 2011 we were at 11.1% and 3rd worst in the State, only ahead of Racine and Beloit.
While the pure unemployment rate is better for everyone, the key in West Bend is our skyrocketing up the chart comparing us to other ‘large’ cities in WI. Really good trend.
I know spending money is more fun than not and saving money is harder than buying new things but the decisions we have made in the recent past are putting West Bend in a better financial position for the future….hopefully the near future. Because we have made sound financial decisions, the rebounding economy and increased development will compound our positive trends.
Every constituent, staff member, alderman and even Mayor has a ‘pet project’ or two that they feel strongly about. Let’s stay focused on investing in items that have a long term benefit to the wellbeing of West Bend and are prioritized in order of Public Safety, Infrastructure and Quality of Life.
Thank you again for working hard to leave West Bend in an even better position than we found it.
Wow. Some amazing work happening in West Bend. Kudos to the Mayor and the Council.
Common Council members approved the 2017 budget during the Nov. 14 meeting that maintains the tax rate at $8.51 per equalized value, imposes a 2 percent merit pay adjustment for some employees, a $225,000 increase in contingency funding and road maintenance, and that continues to limit borrowing to $1.5 million annually to fund capital improvement projects.
“We are proud to say that the level of government is right around that same 2011 spending mark that we had been maintaining for a long time,” City Administrator Jay Shambeau said. “That comes with great accomplishment in trying to do things at a very lean manner, but also comes with somewhat of a risk.”
There have been multiple meetings related to the budget dating back to early October. At one session, Mayor Kraig Sadownikow instructed administrators to accommodate a merit pay increase for personnel while leaving the tax rate steady.
At a subsequent meeting, Shambeau warned the public that state transportation aid funding would be less than the previousyear by about $100,000. Staff and administrators are adjusting the budget to accommodate that shortfall.
The budget will generate an estimated $20.6 million in revenues from property taxes, along with a general fund balance of about $23 million. They will also pay slightly more than $4 million in interest and principal for debts incurred.
To incorporate the decreased state funding and Sadownikow’s directive into the budget, Shambeau and staff had to reduce expenses or find additional savings in other areas.
Nov. 13, 2016 – West Bend, WI – West Bend City Clerk and assistant City Administrator Amy Reuteman is leaving.
This is a story you’ll read first at WashingtonCountyInsider.com
An email was sent Friday announcing Reutemen was leaving to take a job in Adams County.
Reuteman has worked with the city of West Bend for 16 years; she’s been the city clerk the past eight years and last November 2015 she was tabbed as the new assistant city administrator in West Bend.
It’s good to see the city being smart and using the change in the law for the taxpayers’ benefit.
West Bend officials will delay advertising a work contract, taking advantage of a change in the law, to determine if they are able to reduce the cost or solicit additional bids for a Public Works project.
Members of the Common Council unanimously voted Monday to permit city administrators to advertise a sanitary sewer extension for vendors to submit bids, with the caveat they publish it at the beginning of 2017 when changes to the prevailing wage law take effect.
As the West Bend City Council chooses his replacement tonight, a trial date has been set for former West Bend City Administrator, T.J. Justice. He is accused of child enticement-prostitution and soliciting a child for prostitution – both felonies. His jury trial is set for December 13th in Waukesha County.
Incidentally, West Bend’s new City Administrator is Jay Shambeau, who will be leaving his job as the county Planning and Parks administrator.
The City of West Bend is reducing its costs and headcount.
City officials purchased trucks with a mechanical lever arm that drivers can maneuver to grab cans from curbs and empty them into a storage area on the vehicle. Prior to the purchase, additional staff was required to perform the same work.
Neumann sent a memo to acting City Administrator Amy Reuteman stating the upgraded trucks reduced the number of required employees from seven to three. Having anticipated the upgrade, city administrators cut a position in the department.
You always hate to see people lose their jobs. Hopefully these folks can be repurposed elsewhere. I don’t have the cost of the new trucks at my fingertips, but I remember that the ROI when they purchased them was pretty strong. Still, it’s good to see government actually being reduced for once.
Members of the Common Council voted 5-4 on Monday to approve an ordinance to allow a change to the municipal code that allows residents to hunt deer with crossbows and bows and arrows at public parks in the city limits of West Bend. Mayor Kraig Sadownikow was the tie-breaking vote, along with aldermen John Butschlick, Steve Hutchins, Mike Chevalier and Steve Hoogester.
The issue occupied two agenda items for the Common Council and Hutchins introduced the topic for members to discuss.
“We are going to hunt the parks,” Hutchins said. “Part of the reason for that is, if you hunt everything around it, the parks turn into sanctuaries.”
According to the ordinance, hunting activities will be governed by the city’s participation in the Deer Management Assistance Program governed by the state Department of Natural Resources, which is responsible for issuing the required permits.
The designated parks are Regner, Riverside, Ridge Run, Quass Creek, Bicentennial, Silverbrook Creek Parkway and Royal Oaks.
There should be some continued discussion of the best way to safely hunt in the parks, but there does need to be a mechanism for population control.
This would be good news for my little city. Mayor Sadownikow has been a great mayor.
Sadownikow said, “It’s very likely I will be running again.”
My column for the West Bend Daily News is online. Here you go:
The city administrator for West Bend, T.J. Justice, has been arrested and charged with two felony counts — one for child enticement-prostitution and one for soliciting a child for prostitution. If convicted, Justice could spend the next 50 years in prison. Justice has posted bail and is on paid administrative leave from his city job until the Common Council decides what to do with him. At this point, there are more questions than answers, but the ramifications will be felt in our little city for some time to come.
According to the criminal complaint, Justice began texting with a teenage girl in May 2015. The texts were salacious, with Justice repeatedly and forcefully telling the girl that he wanted to have sex with her and was willing to pay her money for it.
In September 2015, the girl’s mother discovered the texts and responded to Justice saying, “no I’m 16, stop.” Justice responded with surprise at her age, but then appears to have continued aggressively soliciting the girl for sex with full knowledge that he was pursuing an underage girl. At one point he even allegedly texted, “your age is a turn on accept that and let’s figure this out babe.”
This February, the girl’s mother contacted the police about the situation. A Muskego police detective posed as the girl and contacted Justice to set up a meeting Thursday to have sex for $200. Justice showed up right on time with a bottle of Viagra in the car and was subsequently arrested. After first denying it, he confessed claiming that he would only have had sex with the girl if she consented — as if that ameliorates the fact that he was allegedly intending to pay an underage girl, who cannot legally consent, for sex.
Where do we go from here? As far as Justice is concerned, the criminal justice system will take care of him. It appears from the criminal complaint that the police did a superb job collecting evidence and the likelihood of conviction is high. Hopefully the next time we hear from Mr. Justice is in 50 years when the girl is collecting Social Security and our grandchildren are arguing over where to place a released nonagenarian sex offender.
As for the city of West Bend, there are a lot of questions that need to be answered and city leaders will need to find a replacement while caring for city employees reeling from the news. If the criminal complaint is true, it is clear Justice is a rotten human being and a predator. It is possible that he was a master manipulator and successfully concealed his rottenness from friends and coworkers. That has certainly happened in the past where horrible people manage to appear perfectly normal in polite society.
It is also possible that signs were overlooked, or worse, covered up. We already know that Justice lied on his application for city employment, saying that he had a college degree when he did not. At the time, the Common Council and mayor considered that fact against his record of achievement and decided to forgive that transgression. Since Justice has been a city employee, were there other transgressions? Were there complaints? If so, what happened? Are there more victims?
One thing that jumps out from the criminal complaint is how brazen Justice was. He used his own phone and name while openly soliciting a teenage girl he had never met. It was either incredibly stupid or incredibly arrogant. While it is possible that Justice was able to hide his hideous behavior, the shameless way in which he behaved in soliciting a child makes it difficult to believe that this was the first and only incident.
As I said, there a lot of questions and it has been less than a week since Justice was arrested. While we must push for answers, we must also be patient as people work through the legal and procedural issues. Since this is a personnel issue with the city, some information won’t be forthcoming for some time, which will be frustrating. And there will be those who oppose the current city leadership who will seek to use this for their own political advantage. We must be discerning in separating fact from fiction.
This incident also serves as another in a long line of reminders that parents must monitor their kids’ online behavior. It is not about trusting your kids. It is about not trusting people like Justice who may be preying on them.
Wow. This is pretty huge news for our little city. Via the Washington County Insider.
West Bend City Administrator T.J. Justice has been suspended with pay and is under investigation.
West Bend Mayor Kraig Sadownikow said there is an ongoing criminal investigation being performed by law enforcement in Waukesha County.
The city of West Bend Police Department will also be performing its own investigation.
MORE UPDATES FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY INSIDER:
Records from Waukesha County Court show a pair of search warrants were issued on April 22.
COURT ORDERED A $5,000.00 CASH BOND IN ADDITION TO A $20,000.00 SIGNATURE BOND. Defendant to comply with I.D. Processing. Defendant to have no contact with V. d/o/b 2/26/99 or her mother K listed in the Criminal Complaint.
Defendant to not access the internet for any purpose other than for employment during normal work hours to access the internet. Defendant to have no contact with juvenile females under the age of 18 in person or by text. Defendant allowed non collect phone calls.
According to Waukesha County Court records Justice is charged with a pair of felony counts of soliciting a child for prostitution and Child Enticement-Prostitution.
CHANNEL 12 HAS ADDITIONAL DETAILS:
Despite the information, Justice allegedly continued the pursuit, writing:
- “The age thing doesn’t bother me as long as we stay honest with each other. I can offer some income here and there for you on the side.”
- “We had a deal worked out once … I’m guessing you were 15 when we first chatted which is fine just be honest with things.”
- “I’d love to explore the Sugar Daddy thing but it would HAVE to stay between us and I’d wanna talk to you by phone first.”
- “We have sex… you get money and maybe shopping every once in a while or I pick you up jewelry here and there.”
- “Your age is a turn on accept that and let’s figure this out babe.”
The teen’s mother ultimately turned over the phone to the Muskego Police Department. A detective there continued conversing with Justice, posing as “V.”
UPDATE: Washington County Insider has a copy of the criminal complaint.
It’s a story we told you about first at WashingtonCountyInsider.com as contractors worked today to move the new pedestrian bridge in place over the Milwaukee River.It appeared the bridge delivered was not exactly what the common council had approved as they signed off on a white bridge. Mayor Kraig Sadownikow said the contractor made a mistake, it will be white and the contractor has until the end of May to have it all done.
“No joy when someone makes a mistake but it will be corrected,” Sadownikow said.
From the Washington County Insider:
One more step forward to saving the theatre/bridge: The Downtown West Bend BID Board met Thursday morning and voted unanimously to cover a surety, up to a $75,000 on the theatre bridge.
That means if the project to rehab the bridge does not move forward by January 31, 2017 and the bridge has to come down the BID would be responsible for covering that cost.
The reason the surety is need is because in the coming weeks the mayor is going to go before the Common Council and try to convince them to waive a $45,000 federal grant to cover demolition of the bridge. “I have to protect the taxpayers,” said Mayor Kraig Sadownikow.
There’s a bit of a kerfuffle going on in West Bend regarding a little bridge over the Milwaukee River that goes to nowhere. The Washington County Insider has been all over it for a while now. I encourage you to read through a lot of the back story there if you are interested. The West Bend Daily News also has a pretty good story about it in the newspaper today. I’ll give you the short version…
In 1982, an enclosed pedestrian bridge was built over the Milwaukee River between downtown and an outlet mall. Over time, the outlet mall was closed and then torn down. The bridge was abandoned and half of it was torn down with the mall. This is what it looked like this afternoon:
Until recently, it still had its glass walls, but it is in the process of being demolished, which brings us to the kerfuffle.
Over the past few years, and through several iterations of debate, the city has been trying to figure out what to do about crossing the river between downtown and the Museum of Wisconsin Art. Currently, between the two streets that cross the river, there are two small pedestrian bridges and the defunct bridge to nowhere. Earlier this year, the city decided to construct a new pedestrian bridge and tear down the bridge to nowhere and one of the other pedestrian bridges which is old and very close to where the new one will be. Here’s a picture of the river as it stands today:
You can see the current pedestrian bridge in the foreground and the bridge to nowhere in the background. Both are scheduled to be demolished and the new bridge built between them.
All good, right? No.
A group of people are also trying to renovate the long defunct theater in downtown West Bend. Their vision is to create an entertainment destination centered around the renovated theater. Central to that vision is the bridge to nowhere, which they want as a bridge to somewhere – namely parking across the river. Their plans are in the early stages, but they think that demolishing the bridge may endanger the whole project. To that end, Terry Becker has started a petition to save the bridge on Change.org.
The problem now is a matter of time and money. The project is already in motion. Part of the project is being funded with a grant from the state, which is based on plans to demolish the bridge to nowhere. If they don’t demolish the bridge, the city would have to waive the grant and come up with the funding from city taxpayers. That amount is about $45k, I think.
As Mayor Sadownikow points out in a letter on the Washington County Insider, if the Common Council is going to cancel the demolition and waive the state funds, they need to put it on the agenda for the January 4th meeting, which means it needs to be published by December 21st. Sadownikow says:
I will not support, nor ask the Council to support, removing demo from the State/Federally funded portion of the contract only to find out the Theatre project does not move forward and the money to remove the bridge is gone. West Bend will be left with half a bridge and the local taxpayer holding the bag.
I agree with that completely. The fact is that the theater and the bridge have been out of use and in disrepair for over a decade. We’ve heard rumblings of renovating the theater for years. I do not see any reason for the taxpayers to take a risk on having to pay tens of thousands of dollars on a promise of future development. And it is that… a promise. Nobody has put forth any actual plans with a plan for financing it yet.
The only way I would support changing the plan to demolish the bridge to nowhere is if two things happen. First, the developers who want it need to replace the money that would be lost in state funding if we do not demolish the bridge. Second, the developers would need to put funds in escrow for the purpose of demolishing the bridge if they do not complete their project by a specified date – perhaps this time next year. That way, if their plans fall through, we can still tear down the bridge so it won’t be an eyesore for another decade.
A few weeks ago, a City of West Bend committee held a public hearing to begin the process of gathering public input about how to prioritize and pay for transportation infrastructure needs in the city. I covered it in this post.
Now they are taking the next step by asking the public for their input via an online survey.
It is a short survey. I had a couple of thoughts after filling it out. First, it is an online survey with no security to prevent people from outside of the city from filling it out or people taking it multiple times. It’s a handy and inexpensive way to gather information, but the results should only be considered as part of a bigger picture.
Second, I notice that it asks us to rank the options in order. The three options are to (1) keep the current plan, which is to continue increasing transportation spending at a rate higher than inflation; (2) add a wheel tax or other special tax; and (3) go to referendum for a property tax increase. It does not escape my notice that there isn’t an option to either keep spending at the rate of inflation or actually decrease spending. This frames the issue as transportation infrastructure spending must increase and the only questions are how much and how will it be funded? That’s unfortunate.
My column for the West Bend Daily News is online. They’ve changed the platform where I can link to it now. Here it is:
It has long been held the government that has the most impact on one’s daily life is local government. Nothing could be truer than with the responsibility of local government to build and maintain the local streets on which we almost all travel and on which the commerce of a city flows. The city of West Bend’s Transportation Committee met last week to gather input about if and how the city should go about improving the overall quality of the city’s streets.
Measuring the overall quality of a city’s streets is no easy task. It is common for people to grouse about the streets because they are the most visible element of a city’s infrastructure. People drive, walk or ride on them every hour of every day, but virtually no one traverses all of the city’s streets in a year — much less a day. As such, someone’s perception of a city’s streets is largely driven by their experience on the streets that take them on their daily errands.
For example, my perception of West Bend’s streets is that they are pretty good. The streets between my home, church and frequent retail destinations are all in good condition. But when I occasionally find myself in some of the older parts of the city, the streets could use some work. For people who live and work in those older neighborhoods, their perception is likely that the streets of the city are in poor shape.
This makes it difficult for city leaders to use citizen complaints as a measurement of overall street quality. Citizen complaints are a very subjective view and one where one cranky citizen on a bad street with an axe to grind can give a massively skewed vision of reality.
In order to be more objective about measuring the aggregate quality of streets in the city, West Bend adopted the Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating scale as a more-objective measurement tool. The PASER scale, which was developed by the University of WisconsinMadison Transportation Information Center, measures pavement on a scale of one to 10 with 10 being a brand new street. The scale is not perfect. It is still somewhat subjective because it only uses a visual inspection, but it allows a fairly straightforward way to measure the quality of West Bend’s roughly 130 miles of streets.
The PASER rating is calculated every other year. In 2011, some folks were concerned because West Bend’s overall PASER rating dropped to 5.89, as compared to a benchmark of 6.11 in 2005. In response, the city has increased spending for streets by about 25 percent over the past several years. In the most recent rating in 2013, the city’s PASER rating climbed to 6.05. The 2015 rating has not yet been released.
All of this brings us to the meeting last week in which the committee asked the citizens if they want better streets, and if so, how would they like to pay for them?
For the first question, it is easy for citizens to say they want better roads, but at what cost? West Bend’s current PASER rating is actually above average for cities of a similar size in Wisconsin. The estimates are that if the taxpayers increase spending on streets by about 150 percent, it would raise the city’s PASER rating by about one rating.
Going back to people’s perceptions, if the city’s overall rating is a 7.05 instead of a 6.05, would the citizens be more satisfied? That depends on whether or not any given citizen is able to take advantage of better streets. According to Alderman Rich Kasten, who chaired the committee, they have not found any study that correlates PASER rating with citizen satisfaction. We do not know if a PASER rating of seven versus six will have any perceptible impact on citizen satisfaction or if the PASER rating is really only good for prioritizing street construction projects.
As for the second question, if the citizens of West Bend want to improve their overall street conditions, the only way to do it is to spend more. That money has to come from somewhere. The committee formally asked for input on five options and discussed a sixth. The options were a (1) wheel tax; (2) garbage fee; (3) grants; (4) special assessment; (5) property tax increase; and (6) a city sales tax increase that is not currently permitted by state law, but is under consideration in Madison.
In short order, the answers to the options should be (1) no; (2) no way; (3) yes; (4) absolutely not; (5) nope; and (6) are you kidding me?
At this point, West Bend has already increased spending on streets substantially, but has not yet seen the full effect of that increased spending. The PASER rating increased in 2013 and will likely do so again when the 2015 ratings are tabulated.
Even if that were not the case, the city’s rating is already higher than those of similar cities. It is not justifiable for the city to increase spending even further — much less impose additional taxes — to increase a rating that has no known measurable impact on citizen satisfaction.
Kudos to the city of West Bend’s Transportation Committee for actively engaging the citizens in this important discussion about a critical responsibility of city government. They should advise the Common Council to stay the course, apply for grants that are available and continue to focus on prioritizing projects with an eye to overall citizen satisfaction.
West Bend’s Transportation Committee met tonight to discuss transportation funding and the city’s options. The Washington County Insider was there and has a full report here. Be sure to read the whole story, but the gist is that West Bend’s roads need some work and the committee is considering making a recommendation to the council of keeping the status quo or recommending one of the following:
1) Wheel tax – possibly $20 with 31,600 vehicles in West Bend over five years it would generate $3.1 million.
2) Garbage fee – $50 with 9,000 homes over five years would generate $2.2 million. It was noted that type of fee could impact the tax levy.
3) Grants – the city engineer said some were successful and others more difficult.
4) Special assessment – Kasten noted there was no appetite on the council for that.
5) Property tax increase
6) Sales tax increase – There’s apparently legislation in the works in Madison to increase local sales tax and allow municipalities to put it on the ballot and then target where the tax would go. This is nowhere near feasible yet.
I attended the meeting and here are my thoughts on the matter…
First off, I think that the committee is engaging in a sincere effort to address a real issue and listen to what the public wants. It was said a couple of times that it may be that the public doesn’t want to spend any more on roads and that’s fine. This meeting was for public input, but they also plan to do surveys and possibly a referendum if they ask for a new tax. Unlike a lot of public hearings I’ve been to, this one appeared to be a real effort to actually gather public input. Unusual… I know…
Second, it is worth noting the data behind the push. There are two measurements that the city uses to gauge the quality of the roads. The first is the “Paserware” or “Paser” system which grades all of the streets on a scale of 1 – 10 with 10 being a brand new road. This rating is released every 2 years. West Bend’s rating was a 6.11 in 2005; dropped to 5.89 by 2011; and was last rated a 6.05 in 2013. They expect the new rating for 2015 later this year. West Bend’s rating is a bit above average for cities of a similar size in Wisconsin.
The second way the city measures the overall quality of the roads is by citizen complaints. I asked about this at the meeting and there does not appear to be any quantitative data on citizen complaints as to how many there have been; who they are coming from; whether or not the volume has changed over time; etc. For example, one cranky citizen on a crummy street can give the appearance of a crisis if he called every alderman and the mayor once a week to complain.
Third, the city has increased the spending on roads by about 25% over the past few years. The city spends about $925k per year on road repairs.
Fourth, Alderman Kasten said that they looked for some studies or correlating link between Paser score and citizen satisfaction. At what point do people say that their city has good streets? At a score of 7? 8? 10? 5? A lot of that depends on whether you live on a good street or not, but how does the Paser score track to overall satisfaction? There isn’t any data to answer that question.
Fifth, the put up a slide that I couldn’t see very well that showed an analysis the city engineer did that estimated the city’s Paser score by spending. If I heard correctly, if the city roughly doubled the spending on roads, it would increase the city’s Paser score by about one point.
So what do I think? Based on the information presented, I don’t see any reason to consider any new funding for streets at this time. The city has already substantially increased spending in the past few years, but there hasn’t been enough time to evaluate the results of that increase. We know that the Paser score went up between 2011 and 2013, but we don’t know what it is now. We don’t know if the Paser score actually means anything to overall citizen satisfaction, but we can use it to compare West Bend to similar communities. By that comparison, the city is already faring pretty well.
As for the citizen complaints, we don’t know if the volume of complaints has changed since the city increased spending on roads. If we find that the Paser score increases in 2015, but the complaints remain unchanged since 2011, then what does that mean? Is the city prioritizing the wrong roads? If complaints have decreased as the Paser score increased, then shouldn’t we let the new spending rate continue as it is for a few years and see where that gets us?
One thing I know for certain is that, as several of the aldermen said, there isn’t any appetite in West Bend for new taxes – whether it be in the form of a wheel tax, increased levy, sales tax, or anything else.
I thank the committee for their serious and thoughtful look at one of the most important city functions.
FYI. They are floating the idea of a wheel tax for West Bend. It might be worth West Bend residents’ time to voice your opinion on that before recommendations get to the council.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WEST BEND – A transportation committee created by the West Bend Common Council will gather public input next Monday evening as part of its assessment of transportation funding. District 5 Alderman Rich Kasten, who chairs the committee, announced that the hearing will be held in the council chambers at city hall, 1115 S. Main Street, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, August 10.
“The committee has reviewed street condition data and the methods used to prioritize street repairs and maintenance schedules while also looking at comparable communities,” said Ald. Kasten. “The purpose of this meeting is to give the public an opportunity to let the committee know whether or not significant changes to the city’s efforts are warranted.”
The city engineer’s office will provide information on the current means of identifying roads needing improvements and a history of funding levels. The city has increased the amount it funds roads over the past several years.
“Investing in street upkeep has been a priority for the common council,” said Kasten. “But it’s also an expensive priority and one that can’t keep up with the needs.”
The committee also expects to conduct an online poll this year before finalizing its report and submitting to the common council.
For more information, contact:
T.J. Justice |
From the Washington County Insider.
Randy Koehler returns to West Bend government: This past April former Dist. 4 alderman Randy Koehler stepped down from local government after losing the April 7 election.
Now, three short months later, Koehler is back and on Monday the West Bend Common Council will approve several mayoral appointments as Koehler will be added to a handful of committees including the Board of Zoning Appeals, the Ethics Committee and the Redevelopment Authority.
Monday’s meeting gets underway at 6:30 p.m.
Koehler was approved by all three committees tonight. This is great for West Bend! Koehler is a smart, conservative guy who has, and will, serve the community well.