I didn’t know this. It seems a little odd, but makes some sense.
The state Government Accountability Board points out that doing so constitutes election fraud under Wisconsin law. It would be a Class I felony, punishable by up to 18 months in prison and a $10,000 fine.
It’s illegal to show your marked ballot to anyone. GAB spokesman Reid Magney says the law was intended to prevent people from selling their votes and then showing their ballots as proof they voted as requested.
No, it’s still not a nice place to live.
A new Amnesty International report paints a gruesome picture of summary executions, torture and ill-treatment in North Korea as Kim Jong Un succeeded his late father, Kim Jong Il, as the country’s ruler last December.
The country used firing squads or staged traffic accidents to execute 30 officials involved in talks to unite North and South Korea, according to the 2012 Amnesty International report released Thursday. It also notes that the country had been questioned about another 37 reported executions between 2007 and 2010 for “financial crimes.”
As the ruling authority shifted to Kim Jong Un, the country’s State Security agency detained another 200 North Korean officials, some of whom are now feared executed or in prison camps, the report notes.
Of the five senators who participated in Wednesday’s press conference—Barbara Mikulski (D., Md.), Patty Murray (D., Wash.), Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.), Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) and Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.)—three pay their female staff members significantly less than male staffers.
Murray, who has repeatedly accused Republicans of waging a “war a women,” is one of the worst offenders. Female members of Murray’s staff made about $21,000 less per year than male staffers in 2011, a difference of 35.2 percent.
That is well above the 23 percent gap that Democrats claim exists between male and female workers nationwide. The figure is based on a 2010 U.S. Census Bureau report, and is technically accurate. However, as CNN’s Lisa Sylvester has reported, when factors such as area of employment, hours of work, and time in the workplace are taken into account, the gap shrinks to about 5 percent.
A significant “gender gap” exists in Feinstein’s office, where women also made about $21,000 less than men in 2011, but the percentage difference—41 percent—was even higher than Murray’s.
Rules are rules… sheesh.
COMMENTARY | Michael Rudi, 17-year-old high school student and an asthmatic, very nearly died because the school nurse refused to let him use his inhaler because his mother didn’t sign a form.
Instead, WKMG reports, Rudi says, “like something out of a horror film,” she watched him until he started to lose consciousness. And then she locked the door.
His mother found him there, against a wall, unable to breathe, the nurse looking at him, when she got to the school. According to the report, Deltona High School and Verona County officials stand by the nurse’s decision.
It would seem appropriate for the nurse to give critical care even without a form.
Wisconsin banks reported their highest earnings for the first quarter in four years, and more of the banks in the state were profitable than in any quarter since March 2008.
This is very troubling.
State and local leaders on Wednesday called for independent audits of the Milwaukee Police Department’s crime numbers, citing a Journal Sentinel investigation that found more than 500 cases in which serious assaults were misclassified as lesser offenses.
The Journal Sentinel review discovered an additional 800 cases since 2009 that follow the same pattern but couldn’t be verified with available public records. Copies of those incident reports have been sought from police through an open records request.
The Journal Sentinel found enough misreported cases in 2011 alone that violent crime would have increased 1.1% instead of falling 2.3% from the reported 2010 figures, which had their own errors.
Dozens of misclassified assaults were sent to FBI crime reporting experts, who confirmed that they should have been marked as aggravated assaults, which are counted in the city’s violent crime rate. Police officials agreed that a sample of assault cases shared by the Journal Sentinel were misreported.
I don’t buy Chief Flynn’s excuse. I’m reminded of a little passage I read recently in McCullough’s biography of President Truman. Truman said, “a man not honorable in his marital relations is not usually honorable in any other.” The fact that Flynn and his boss, Mayor Barrett, are more upset at the reporting of this story than they are at the sbstance of it is troubling.
My wife had to remind me that B&S is 9 years old today. Thanks for reading, folks.
![]()
Dear Mayor Barrett:
I write to you as a taxpayer, a voter, and a Republican legislator representing the varied interests of central and southern Waukesha County. In short, as each of these things, I am deeply dismayed at the tone of your campaign and your lack of courage to face the reality of the challenges facing our great state.
Recently, John McCormack of the Weekly Standard queried of you and former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk how you would have addressed the $3.6 billion deficit that the state was facing in the fall/winter of 2010 and 2011. Maybe you recall your response. In case you don’t, you stated:
“And then [Walker] said we have a deficit. First of all, I didn’t buy the fact that we had a deficit.”
Maybe you were misinformed, or maybe your views on the deficit we faced are yet evolving; but I assure you, as does the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau, that the deficit was real.
But equally troubling as your refusal to “buy” reality on the fiscal condition of the state, is that you have been less than forthcoming as to how to address the shortfall (though, ostensibly, if you’ve convinced yourself that no deficit existed, then the need to address the shortfall matters not).
In this race, a mulligan of your 2010 bid for governor, are we to believe that what you recognized as truth in 2010 is no longer valid, that a deficit was, in fact, fictitious? As a taxpayer, a voter, and a Republican legislator representing the varied interests of central and southern Waukesha County, I’m confused, because right now I’m looking at an op-ed you penned in October, 2010, in the Madison Capitol Times that says you would, “balance the deficit”.
But setting aside my confusion, and seemingly yours, I notice a theme developing that ran through your last campaign for governor 18 months ago, and your current campaign for governor.
Both are conspicuously short on recognition of the challenges we faced and are finally beginning to claw away from.
Last week, the Co-Chairs of the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Finance – you know, the one that actually writes the state budget (and presumably the Republican legislators you would have “quaking in their boots” if they didn’t repeal Act 10, the law that reined in government unions) – sent you a letter asking you for specifics on how you would have addressed the budget shortfall that the state was facing last year. I restate and emphasize those questions here.
On cue, your response was neither appropriate for someone who claims to be messianic in his bid to end a “civil war” nor mindful of the challenges we face. You called it a “stunt”. No, Mr. Mayor, a stunt is running twice for governor in as many years.
Representative Vos and Senator Darling posed serious questions about serious issues and you were dismissive. Certainly, Ulysses S. Grant never dismissed Robert E. Lee. But this isn’t an allegorical, or history, lesson, Mr. Mayor. This is the here and now, and the voters and taxpayers of Wisconsin deserve honest answers to honest questions, regardless of how uncomfortable honesty makes your campaign consultants and benefactors.
Which leads me to my next point, and perhaps the more serious one.
Earlier this week, Governor Scott Walker announced that his administration would release recalculated jobs numbers based on a more thorough set of data and refined matrices that paint a clearer picture of where our economy, vis a vis, employment, stands and is headed.
On cue, your response was neither appropriate for someone who claims to be messianic in his bid to end a “civil war” nor mindful of the challenges we face. You alleged that the Walker administration was going to “spin” the figures to paint a rosier picture than reality. I’ll presume you get the irony (if not, see your recent reaction to the deficit noted above).
Mr. Mayor, I fear, and God knows I want to be wrong, that your response to this and the tenor of your campaign, appears that you don’t share the angst of the rest of Wisconsin, but rather, relish, bad economic news. Forget the mulligan campaign you are running for a moment: let’s see and discuss the revised numbers and if the data – after a true and public review – truly indicates something contrary to your reflexive response, then I hope you would publicly acknowledge that Wisconsin’s economy has, or is, turning a corner and moving forward.
But alas, there is no indication that you or the Democrat party wants to see positive in the economy. It was exhibited by Democrats in the legislature – and by your absence in public – when we tried to reform the state’s mining laws and create thousands of new jobs in northern Wisconsin and here in Southern Wisconsin.
It was exhibited when your supporters wrote to leaders of Milwaukee Public Schools asking them to not support union contract renegotiations to save teaching jobs because, “we believe such legislation will have an adverse impact on all Wisconsin public employees. Such legislation will enable Governor Walker to claim victory of his policy to reign [sic] in public employee wages and benefits. Because he did not adequately fund education, we are all currently suffering. Allowing Governor Walker to make such a claim just before the recall election will prove detrimental to recalling him and, therefore, will only enhance his ability to further harm all Wisconsin public employees.”
I wish I wasn’t compelled to write this letter, because I believe you a better person than what your consultants and benefactors are pressuring you to be and that this election, more so than any other, behooves us all to be more candid than we, as politicians, are wont to be.
I wish you the best and good luck on June 5th.
Warmest regards,
Bill Kramer
Taxpayer, voter, and Republican legislator representing the varied interests of central and southern Waukesha County
It’s good to see tablets being adopted. I do question why they aren’t exploring less expensive tablets, though. There are some really nice ones out there that don’t carry the price tag of the iPad.
The positive response by students and teachers to the introduction of tablets in classrooms this year has motivated district leaders to buy more.
The school board will vote on Wednesday to allow Jefferson Elementary to buy 120 additional iPads, bringing its total collection to 198. If the measure passes, the school would become the first in the district to have enough tablets for all students and teachers to have one.
“The reality is there’s a higher need for iPads in the classroom than we have iPads,” said Principal Julie Skelton. “Teachers are signing them out weeks in advance. They have become such a natural part of teaching… because of the great impact in the classroom. We need to keep moving in that direction.”
Act 10 has been a resounding success for taxpayers.
The Beacon Institute analysis argues the law may have been controversial, even divisive, but there’s no disputing its benefit to taxpayers.
“The cost-saving measures prevented painful tax increases that would have damaged the state’s private economy resulting in slower job and income growth,” said Paul Bachman, BHI director of research. “Moreover, the provisions avoided further painful layoffs of school teachers and other public employees.”
There have been numerous media reports of school districts and municipalities that have balanced their budgets or hired more educators by employing the so-called tools of Act 10.
Municipalities will realize annual cost savings of between $775 million and $1.2 billion, according to the analysis.
Is Barrett too stupid to understand what “John Doe” means? The whole proceeding is legally bound to be secret. If Walker disclosed anything about the proceedings, he would be breaking the law. And yet, Barrett sees fit to demand that Walker break the law. I understand that Barrett is apparently privy to the entire investigation - contrary to the law - but that doesn’t empower him to give license to others to violate the law.
Barrett demands that Governor Walker release all information related to the John Doe investigation – including more than 1,000 emails that were sent through a secret internet system set up near Walker’s office when he was serving as Milwaukee’s County Executive.
My column for the Daily News is online. It’s called, “Standing with Walker.” Here’s a part:
Even though the accomplishments listed in this column is incomplete, even this short list is truly remarkable when one considers that Walker hasn’t even reached the half-way point of his term and has been dogged by liberal obstructionism. More than that, the things that Walker has accomplished are substantial and real. Wisconsin will benefit for generations because of some of these policies.
In short, Walker promised that he would govern according to his values for the betterment of Wisconsin and he has fulfilled his promise. That’s why we elected him. That’s why we continue to stand by him. And we will continue to stand by him as long as he continues to stand by us. Judging by his record, we’ll be standing together for a very long time.
You see it from time to time. I notice it most often in airport bathrooms. No, I’m not talking about wide stances… I’m talking about those people who pretend to wash their hands when they see that someone else is around. You know the guys (I don’t know about girls). They stand and spray, jauntily zip up, and begin their strut out of the lavatory. Then, lo and behold, they notice you. YOU, with your askance glare and disdainful sniff. So they walk over to the sink. They turn it on, flail around, but nothing appears to get wet. Then they grab a paper towel - just one, and we know that one never does the job of drying fully saturated hands - and they prance out into the world.
Frauds.
I see you.
I had high hopes for D.A. Chisolm…
Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm is defending the chief investigator in the John Doe investigation into Scott Walker’s administration while he was county executive after a report surfaced that David Budde has a recall sign in his yard.
In a statement Monday, Chisholm said Budde told him his wife, who is a county employee, put the sign in the couple’s yard about a week ago.
“I do not regulate or control the constitutional freedoms of my employees’ families in their private lives,” the district attorney said. “They have the right, under state law, and in this case, county civil service rules, to express their political views as does any other citizen.”
...and then he has spent gobs of money on a secret investigation that has lingered for years while someone in his office illegally leaks information to Democrats and the media. Now he’s showing that he doesn’t give a rip about even the appearence of impartiality from his staff. It’s a shame for someone who holds so much power to destroy lives to prove to be a partisan on a matter so grave.