When deer hunters take to the fields this fall, they will be allowed to fire rifles in diseased deer areas of south and central Wisconsin under a state rule change that some local officials say endangers residents near hunting land.
Now if only they’d do that for all of the other areas.
I don’t understand why people think a slug is less dangerous than a .308; neither one is going very far in a heavily wooded area. Oh, well. Same reason that hospitals call their NMR machine an “MRI,” I suppose: because the word “nuclear” scared the proles back in the 70s.
I never understand that either. Also think about where you are when you fire your gun. The vast majority of the time - you are elevated above the ground, so you are shooting at a downward angle. Hence any missed shots (or pass throughs) are only going to go a very short distance before hitting the ground.
Don’t assume shooting down from an elevated angle is always safe. The round can miss a deer, strike a rock at or just below the surface of the ground, and ricochet up.
I experienced a slug go over my head because of this. 14 year old kid was in a stand 200 yards from me. Doe ran past him about 30-40 yards. His gun may have been pointed down, but the second shot skipped off a rock and the slug came over my head. I can still remember what that sounds like. Not fun at all.