Saturday, June 27, 2009

Obama’s New Thoughts on Gitmo Detainees

Obama mulls indefinite detentions.

The White House is considering whether to issue an executive order to indefinitely imprison a small number of Guantanamo Bay detainees, concerned that Congress might otherwise stymie its plans to quickly close the naval prison in Cuba.

Under the proposal, detainees considered too dangerous to prosecute or release would be kept in confinement in the U.S. or possibly overseas, two administration officials said Friday. Otherwise, the White House could get bogged down for months seeking agreement with Congress on a new legal detention system.

No final decisions have been made about the order, which would be the fourth major mandate by President Barack Obama to deal with how the United States treats and prosecutes terror suspects and foreign fighters.

One of the officials said the order, if issued, would not take effect until after the Oct. 1 start of the 2010 fiscal year. Already, Congress has blocked the administration from spending any money this year to imprison the detainees in the United States — which in turn could slow or even halt Obama’s pledge to close the prison by Jan. 21.

The administration also is considering asking Congress to pass new laws that would allow the indefinite detentions, the official said.

(2) Comments
Posted by Owen at 1419 hrs
Law + Politics + Politics - General

  1. Just so I understand ... Its ok to detain them indefinitely ... its just not ok to detain them at Gitmo??

    Does this make sense to anyone besides true believing libs who would rationalize supporting Obama in anything he supported even if he proposed surrendering the entire pacific fleet to Burma or Mayomar or whatever the hell they call it these days??

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on June 27, 2009 at 2035 hrs


  2. Which side of his mouth is this coming out of?

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on June 28, 2009 at 0742 hrs


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.