Fair Share  |   Home  |   Know Your Audience
Wednesday, August 20, 2008

  1. What a disgusting man.  This is a line of basic human decency that virtually no other pro-choice national politician has ever crossed.  Everyone who stands by him after this whole infanticide scandal should hang their heads in disgrace.

    Posted by Calvin Freiburger on August 20, 2008 at 2336 hrs


  2. Even the Feminazis at NARAL didn’t oppose this bill when it was before Congress. it passed on a voice vote — unanimously.

    Posted by Peter on August 21, 2008 at 0038 hrs


  3. Here is his rebuttal

    http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/08/19/f act_check_born_alive_1.php

    Posted by on August 21, 2008 at 0852 hrs


  4. It’s pretty clear how Obama sees the children of this nation: inhuman commodities to be made and destroyed at our whim.  Good gracious.

    Posted by on August 21, 2008 at 0929 hrs


  5. Who really cares what his weasel words are now? He’s on tape opposing legislation that would have prevented babies that had been born alive from dying?

    This man is on the record in support of infanticide. But He’s the Messiah, right? The Anointed One. Hopey-changey and all that stuff, right?

    Posted by Peter on August 21, 2008 at 0930 hrs


  6. Who really cares what his weasel words are now?

    Obama’s said his first act as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act which would pretty much roll back any measures to protect the unborn, and, apparently, the born.

    So I guess we have a clear definition of when life begins - when Obama, as King Solomon, looks at a child and gives his stamp of approval.

    Posted by on August 21, 2008 at 0948 hrs


  7. Obama’s said his first act as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act which would pretty much roll back any measures to protect the unborn, and, apparently, the born.

    Infanticide would become the law of the land. How much longer, really, until we as a socety sanction Peter Singer’s vision of being able to slaughter newborns up to 30 days after birth? There’s not much difference ethically and morally between these people and those that ran Germany in the 1930s and first half of the 1940s.

    Posted by Peter on August 21, 2008 at 1038 hrs


  8. How much longer, really, until we as a socety sanction Peter Singer’s vision of being able to slaughter newborns up to 30 days after birth?

    Actually, Singer advocates not giving protection to children up to ONE YEAR of age and especially if they’re disabled.

    He also is a proponent of granting human rights to apes. 

    I wish I were joking. hmmm

    Posted by on August 21, 2008 at 1104 hrs


  9. "A nation’s greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members.” Mahatma Ghandi

    “You measure the degree of civilisation of a society by how it treats its weakest members.” Winston Churchill

    “A society will be judged by how it treats its weakest members.” Harry Truman

    How can Obama (or any person) claim to be a Christian when he supports things like this? Few things truly disgust me - but this does.

    Posted by on August 21, 2008 at 1511 hrs


Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.