Thursday, May 15, 2008

End the Ethanol Mandate

Wow.  I’m agreeing with the MJS that we should end the ethanol mandate. 

But federal mandates on ethanol should not be maintained or expanded. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and other Republicans who have signed a letter urging the Environmental Protection Agency to consider an ethanol mandate waiver have a point. As does Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who has called for the repeal of tariffs on importing ethanol.

Questions remain on ethanol. There has been an impact on food prices, even if that impact is less than the impact of the rise in oil prices. There is an argument that ethanol is not as efficient as gasoline. Ethanol production is not environmentally benign; in addition to other issues, a report co-authored by a University of Wisconsin-Madison researcher predicts that the “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico will grow, thanks to ethanol production’s impact on the Mississippi watershed.

(3) Comments
Posted by Owen at 2123 hrs
Politics + Politics - General + Politics - Wisconsin

  1. This would be great…but hindsight is 20/20. How many engines have already been damaged (with no recourse) by this crap?

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on May 16, 2008 at 1033 hrs


  2. If ethanol is really for being green or whatever, then why is there a tax on importing it? There’s no tax on importing oil…

    Posted by Matt on May 16, 2008 at 1048 hrs


  3. Sorry this is a bit off-topic, but it’s definitely worth watching.

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmEzNDk3NzRjOWUwM2NkNzRiYTU5OGFhMjA5OTYyY2Q=

    (Interesting, my security word for this post was ...“farm”

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on May 16, 2008 at 1141 hrs


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.