Too funny.
That’s two sexually-suggestive posts this week. Do you worry about offending some of your more conservative readers?
not to mention homoerotic!
Do you worry about offending some of your more conservative readers?
Clearly you are still obsessing over the library issue, but to answer your question… no, I don’t. I blog about what I want to blog about and don’t really concern myself with who I may or may not offend.
How am I “obsessing”? It is clear you have readers who look down on such content & images, and I was curious as to whether you worry about offending them. It seems you don’t. I see little reason to insert some kind of normative claim against me.
bye.
Reminds me of a joke.
A buddy of mine used it to great effect once. We were talking about a colleague who was legend in his cheapness (was wondering if it paid to buy a broom since he was not certain he would be back the following year).
Roger was on vacation in Japan and at a bar. A local woman slid up to him and they hit it off and eventually a cash deal was struck and they went back to his room. As they were disrobing Roger finds out the woman is not a woman, but a man. Roger starts to think about this situation but eventually decides he has already paid so the night proceeds as originally conceived..
Do they put commercials like this on American television? I hope so. At least after 9 PM.
I with you agree. In it something is. Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles.