Saturday, August 07, 2010

4K Dead in West Bend

I have confirmed that the West Bend School District will not pursue 4K.

Good!

(25) Comments
Posted by Owen at 1239 hrs
Politics + Politics - Wisconsin

  1. What? No free day care? Such a shame…  </sarcasm>

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 07, 2010 at 1326 hrs


  2. I found 4K absolutely fantastic for both my kids…  Then again, I was paying for it at a parochial school.  Which cost far less and was a much better value than daycare was.

    Cheers!

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 07, 2010 at 1415 hrs


  3. WHy so good, Owen?

    Was it an inefficient program?
    Do you doubt the educational value of kindergarten for 4 yr olds?
    Is it seen as a luxury WB cannot afford?
    Is it always good to cut out a portion of public education (any cut is a good cut)?

    Elaborate if you will, please. I’ve always been of the mind that investing in the education of our youth is an important civic virtue. What’s the issue with 4K?

    Posted by Mike on August 07, 2010 at 1512 hrs


  4. 4K dead in West Bend?

    Damn, you had my hopes up.

    I thought 4,000 of Glenn Grothman’s constituents were dead.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 07, 2010 at 1547 hrs


  5. Elaborate if you will, please. I’ve always been of the mind that investing in the education of our youth is an important civic virtue. What’s the issue with 4K?

    I thought this was the dumbest thing that I had ever read…..

     

    Then this came along:

    Damn, you had my hopes up.

    I thought 4,000 of Glenn Grothman’s constituents were dead.


    I thought Scott, Maley, and the miserable failure of a bookstore guy were bad….

    Geesh, and you guys rip on the tea party….

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 07, 2010 at 1612 hrs


  6. Oh lighten up. I was only trying to be funny.

    Liberals can never take a joke.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 07, 2010 at 1729 hrs


  7. So-
    No answer then?

    Posted by Mike on August 07, 2010 at 2233 hrs


  8. Mike:

    Was it an inefficient program?

    It was never implemented, so it never became a program. But if it follows the blueprint of most other Liberal “programs”, yes it will be abused thus making it inefficient.

    Do you doubt the educational value of kindergarten for 4 yr olds?

    The indoctrination process is working just fine without traumatizing toddlers at age 4 instead of 5.

    Is it seen as a luxury WB cannot afford?

    More like an unwarranted expense with no redeeming value.

    Is it always good to cut out a portion of public education (any cut is a good cut)?

    Odd how Liberals can consider something that was never implemented as being a cut.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 08, 2010 at 0008 hrs


  9. @Donovan:  I was thinking something very similar, but I probably wouldn’t have put it quite the same way.  Imagine if it had been “4K Dead In Milwaukee” (we can dream) and I said “4000 of Gwen Moore’s constituents”.  Still funny to me, but there would be some real howls from the Lefty trolls here.

    Posted by Deekaman on August 08, 2010 at 0814 hrs


  10. “4K Dead In Milwaukee” (we can only dream)...

    From a true-blue-patriotic “prolifer” I take it?

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 08, 2010 at 1011 hrs


  11. Hey, Peek…get a grip.  It was about 4k kindergarten, not 4000 dead.

    Posted by Deekaman on August 08, 2010 at 1015 hrs


  12. Oops-
    I didn’t read close enough. Sorry. Never implemented, I get it. Forget the business about cuts.

    While I disagree about the value of 4K (I think its a pretty good educational service), I see where folks in WB might not want to start a new program like that right now. As neomom implied, many 4K programs can be quite good.

    “Indoctrination”???  Whatever.

    Posted by Mike on August 08, 2010 at 1627 hrs


  13. Mike - the larger point (and likely reason behind the criticism of you post) was that this wasn’t some new topic posted for the first time. Owen has made his position and reasons for it quite clear in the threads leading up to the apparent decision.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1026 hrs


  14. Mike - the larger point (and likely reason behind the criticism of you post) was that this wasn’t some new topic posted for the first time. Owen has made his position and reasons for it quite clear in the threads leading up to the apparent decision.

    From my perspective, it’s pretty easy to overlook or dismiss a lot of Owen’s topics / posts.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1053 hrs


  15. And I don’t mean that to single out Owen…I mean that in a much more general sense.  Every blog and every poster.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1054 hrs


  16. Especially if they post as anon!

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1057 hrs


  17. From my perspective, it’s pretty easy to overlook or dismiss a lot of Owen’s topics / posts.

    ... and yet a self admitted wealthy business owner such as yourself (heh) spends hours reading and replying to those posts. Hm.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1100 hrs


  18. ... and yet a self admitted wealthy business owner such as yourself (heh) spends hours reading and replying to those posts. Hm.

    ... and posting “serious” questions about the ethnic make up of loosely correlated events, because he/she is “genuinely” curious.  So curious in fact, that he/she has to spend a number of posts over two days to get the information from a group of people / blog that he/she publicly admits is easy to “overlook or dismiss”.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1119 hrs


  19. Jason:

    and posting “serious” questions about the ethnic make up of loosely correlated events, because he/she is “genuinely” curious.  So curious in fact, that he/she has to spend a number of posts over two days to get the information from a group of people / blog that he/she publicly admits is easy to “overlook or dismiss”

    Yet can not find the time to attend in order to get first hand information that would satisfy that curiosity?

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1150 hrs


  20. It’s easy to overlook or dismiss posts on all blogs and news sites, if you ask me.  I’m multi-tasking!

    ... and yet a self admitted wealthy business owner such as yourself (heh) spends hours reading and replying to those posts. Hm.

    I never admitted to being wealthy and it’s pretty easy to see that I don’t read & reply to most of the posts here.

    You people need to tighten your grip on your loose posting!

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1212 hrs


  21. I suppose Joe and Pat will trot this out as a cut.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1249 hrs


  22. “Hey, Peek…get a grip.  It was about 4k kindergarten, not 4000 dead.”

    Oh, Deeka, I’m sure you did.

    Then there’s your suggested imagination.

    You’re such a funny gal.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 09, 2010 at 1818 hrs


  23. And you, Peekaboo may be the dumbest asshat on this blog.

    Posted by Deekaman on August 09, 2010 at 1837 hrs


  24. Wow, that’s precious coming from someone who believes every life is precious.

    Correction: Pretends every life is precious.

    Why don’t get your fat ass over to another bagger party and blow off some more steam?

    I hear some of the baggers love it when your nostril flares.

    Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on August 10, 2010 at 2010 hrs


  25. Gosh, Ron…you’re terrific at parties aren’t you?

    Glad you are so tolerant.

    BTW, my ass isn’t fat.  It’s just these jeans.

    Posted by Deekaman on August 10, 2010 at 2046 hrs


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.