Uhhh… isn’t that kind of the point?
High-risk surgeons can get caught in a “Catch-22” when trying to save a life: what if the patient doesn’t want extraordinary measures taken to keep living?
A new study from a UW-Madison surgical professor suggests advance directives, or “living wills,” don’t work in the surgical suite.
Dr. Margaret “Gretchen” Schwarze, assistant professor of surgery at the UW School of Medicine and Public Health, discovered that only 50 percent of surgeons who do high-risk operations discuss advance directives with their patients before surgery.
An even higher percentage, 54 percent, of the surgeons said they wouldn’t operate if a patient had a directive limiting the use of life support in post-operative care, if the surgeon thought it was necessary for the patient’s survival.
The findings were published online first by the publication Annals of Surgery and were in a UW-Madison news release posted Thursday.
An editorial calling the findings “troubling” accompanied the article, which was in the publications’ March issue.
“The goal of surgery is survival,” Schwarze said in the article. “I think what we are seeing is surgeons have a fierce responsibility for bringing their patients out of surgery alive, and they don’t like advance directives because they feel the directives tie their hands behind their backs.”